Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350275›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2022

Breath octane and acetaldehyde as markers for acute respiratory distress syndrome in invasively ventilated patients suspected to have ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Nanon F L Heijnen, Laura A Hagens, Frederik-Jan van Schooten, Lieuwe D J Bos, Iwan C C van der Horst, Alex Mommers, Marcus J Schultz, Marry R Smit, Dennis C J J Bergmans, Agnieszka Smolinska and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nanon F L HeijnenDept of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Laura A HagensDept of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4629-4465
Frederik-Jan van SchootenDept of Pharmacology and Toxicology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lieuwe D J BosDept of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2911-4549
Iwan C C van der HorstDept of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alex MommersDept of Pharmacology and Toxicology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marcus J SchultzDept of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3969-7792
Marry R SmitDept of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dennis C J J BergmansDept of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4224-6426
Agnieszka SmolinskaDept of Pharmacology and Toxicology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ronny M SchnabelDept of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8410-332X
Maastricht University · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLMahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale: The concentration of octane and acetaldehyde in exhaled breath has good diagnostic accuracy for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to determine whether breath octane and acetaldehyde are able to distinguish the presence and absence of ARDS in critically ill patients suspected to have ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study into exhaled breath analysis using gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Difference in the relative abundance of octane and acetaldehyde in exhaled breath was compared between patients with and without ARDS using the Mann-Whitney U-test and the association was quantified using logistic regression. The discriminative accuracy of octane and acetaldehyde, alone or in combination, was calculated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC). Results: We included 98 patients, of whom 32 had ARDS and 66 did not. The area under the acetaldehyde peak was higher in patients with ARDS (p=0.03), and associated with the presence of ARDS (OR 1.06 per 100 000 count change, 95% CI 1.02-1.13 per 100 000 count change; p=0.01). A combined model with octane and acetaldehyde showed a high specificity and low sensitivity (90% and 40.6%, respectively), with a low accuracy (AUROCC 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.78). Conclusion: Patients suspected to have VAP with ARDS had a higher acetaldehyde concentration in exhaled breath than patients suspected to have VAP without ARDS. However, in this patient population, discrimination of these breath biomarkers for ARDS was poor, indicating the difficulty of translating diagnostic tests between clinical settings.

Identifiers

PMID35350275
PMCPMC8943290
OpenAlexW4220981583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.