Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350226›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2022

Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting.

Sean C Yu, Aditi Gupta, Kevin D Betthauser, Patrick G Lyons, Albert M Lai, Marin H Kollef, Philip R O Payne, Andrew P Michelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sean C YuInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Aditi GuptaInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Kevin D BetthauserDepartment of Pharmacy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Patrick G LyonsDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Albert M LaiInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Marin H KollefDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Philip R O PayneInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Andrew P MichelsonInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate a sepsis prediction model for the general ward setting and extend the evaluation through a novel pseudo-prospective trial design. Design: Retrospective analysis of data extracted from electronic health records (EHR). Setting: Single, tertiary-care academic medical center in St. Louis, MO, USA. Patients: Adult, non-surgical inpatients admitted between January 1, 2012 and June 1, 2019. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Of the 70,034 included patient encounters, 3.1% were septic based on the Sepsis-3 criteria. Features were generated from the EHR data and were used to develop a machine learning model to predict sepsis 6-h ahead of onset. The best performing model had an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC or c-statistic) of 0.862 ± 0.011 and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) of 0.294 ± 0.021 compared to that of Logistic Regression (0.857 ± 0.008 and 0.256 ± 0.024) and NEWS 2 (0.699 ± 0.012 and 0.092 ± 0.009). In the pseudo-prospective trial, 388 (69.7%) septic patients were alerted on with a specificity of 81.4%. Within 24 h of crossing the alert threshold, 20.9% had a sepsis-related event occur. Conclusions: A machine learning model capable of predicting sepsis in the general ward setting was developed using the EHR data. The pseudo-prospective trial provided a more realistic estimation of implemented performance and demonstrated a 29.1% Positive Predictive Value (PPV) for sepsis-related intervention or outcome within 48 h.

Indexed as

electronic health recordsgeneral wardmachine learningpredictionsepsis

Identifiers

PMID35350226
PMCPMC8957791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.