Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350191›Full record

ReviewSynthetic biology (Oxford, England)2021

Development of synthetic biotics as treatment for human diseases.

Aoife M Brennan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Synthetic biology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Reshaping the Treatment Landscape of a Galactose Metabolism Disorder.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aoife M BrennanSynlogic Operating Company, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3413-4723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in synthetic biology have allowed the generation of strains of bacteria that are genetically altered to have specific therapeutic benefits. These synthetic biotics, also widely referred to as engineered living therapeutics, have tremendous potential as a new therapeutic modality, and several have advanced into the clinic and human testing. This review outlines some of the unique attributes of synthetic biotics as well as some of the challenges in their development as prescription products. Regulatory considerations are discussed, and a case study of a program that has advanced into Phase 2 testing is provided: SYNB1618 for the treatment of PKU.

Indexed as

synthetic biologysynthetic biotic medicinestherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID35350191
PMCPMC8944296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.