ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
The Study of Biomechanics and Clinical Anatomy on a Novel Plate Designed for Posterolateral Tibial Plateau Fractures
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimized anterior anatomical fusion plate for ankle arthrodesis: biomechanical and clinical outcomes.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Comparison of three fixation methods for posterolateral fragments in tibial plateau fractures: a biomechanical study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Finite element analysis of the influence of fragment size on biomechanical outcomes of various fixation techniques for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Biomechanical comparison between rim plating and posterior buttress plating for posterolateral tibia plateau fractures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biomechanical evaluation of the modified proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Higher interfragmentary compression force improves lateral tibial plateau fracture stability using locking plate fixation: experimental and simulation verification.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Model Properties and Clinical Application in the Finite Element Analysis of Knee Joint: A Review.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Review
- Biomechanical analysis of different techniques for residual bone defect from tibial plateau bone cyst in total knee arthroplasty.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Potential problem and solution of lateral plate postposition for the posterolateral tibial plateau fracture.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Design considerations for patient-specific bone fixation plates: a literature review.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023Review
- Biomechanics and finite element analysis comparing posterior T-plates with LCP for fixation of posterolateral tibial plate fractures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Different internal fixation methods for Hoffa-like fractures of the tibial plateau: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Biomechanical analysis of internal fixation system stability for tibial plateau fractures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is no consensus about the optimal internal fixation selection for treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fracture. This study described a novel plate through an anterolateral approach for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures (PTPFs). We evaluated the biomechanical performance of a novel plate and two conventional internal implants and investigated the anatomic feasibility of the novel plate. The fracture models were randomly assigned into six groups: Groups A-C were the model groups of posterolateral split fracture, fixed with the posterior buttress plate, the lateral locking plate, and the novel plate, respectively. Groups D-E were the model groups of posterolateral depression fracture, fixed with the posterior buttress plate, the lateral locking plate, and the novel plate, respectively. We evaluated the biomechanical performance of six model groups by the biomechanical testing and finite element analysis. Progressively increasing axial compressive loads were applied to each synthetic fracture model by using a customized indentor under 250-750 N loads. Meanwhile, we dissected 12 fresh frozen knee specimens and fixed them with the novel plate through the anterolateral approach. We recorded the adjacency of the novel plate to important anatomic structures. Biomechanical testing showed that the novel plate had the least displacement, followed by the posterior buttress plate, and the lateral plate had the most displacement in posterolateral split fracture. There was no significant difference in the displacement between the novel plate and the lateral plate at different loads in posterolateral depression fractures. And the posterior buttress plate showed the most displacement. In the finite element analysis, the maximum stress values of Groups A, B, and C were 383.76, 414.63, and 305.07 MPa under the load of 750 N, respectively. The maximum stress values of Groups D, E, and F were 474.28, 436.31, and 413.4 MPa under the load of 750 N, respectively. In the anatomic study, the placement of the novel plate had a low risk of damage to the important anatomic structures of knee posterolateral corner. The novel plate could be a great choice for the treatment of PTPFs due to better biomechanical performance and easy manipulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.