ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2022
Improved non-redundant species screening panels for benchmarking the performance of new investigational antibacterial candidates against Category A and B priority pathogens.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetics and in vivo efficacy of epetraborole against Burkholderia pseudomallei.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- RapidAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Epetraborole, a leucyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitor, demonstrates murine efficacy, enhancing the in vivo activity of ceftazidime against Burkholderia pseudomallei, the causative agent of melioidosis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: NIAID has a programme for testing drug candidates against biodefense and emerging bacterial pathogens that uses defined strain panels consisting of standard laboratory reference strains and strains of clinical origin. Objectives: The current studies were performed to assess the activity of standard-of-care drugs, determine benchmark criteria for new investigational antibacterial candidate prioritization and identify reduced non-redundant strain panels for candidate performance classification. Methods: The susceptibilities of each strain in the screening panels to 40 standard-of-care drugs and clinical drug combinations were determined by percentage growth inhibition using multiple concentrations, a method commonly used in efficient high-throughput screening efforts. The drug susceptibility of each strain was categorized based on interpretive criteria to benchmark the activity of each standard-of-care drug and drug combination, followed by confirmation of select active drugs. Exact match and clustering analyses defined focused non-redundant species and pan-species screening panels. Results: This process revealed a broad spectrum of susceptibilities among strains in each species, with important differences between the standard laboratory reference strains and strains of clinical origin. Exact match and clustering analyses identified subsets of non-redundant strains that can more efficiently classify drug activity resulting in individual species screening panels, a pan-species screening panel and a pan-species maximum resistance panel. Conclusions: This study resulted in improved non-redundant species screening panels for benchmarking the performance of new investigational antibacterial candidates with the greatest potential for efficacy against clinically relevant Category A and B priority and emerging pathogens.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.