Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35350066›Full record

ArticleCancer research2022

Suppression of Endothelial Cell FAK Expression Reduces Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Metastasis after Gemcitabine Treatment.

Marina Roy-Luzarraga, Louise E Reynolds, Beatriz de Luxán-Delgado, Oscar Maiques, Laura Wisniewski, Emma Newport, Vinothini Rajeeve, Rebecca J G Drake, Jesús Gómez-Escudero, Frances M Richards and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endothelial Cell pY397-FAK Expression Predicts the Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrences after Radiotherapy in the SweBCG91-RT Cohort.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Marina Roy-LuzarragaBarts Cancer Institute-A CR-UK Center of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Center, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom.
Louise E ReynoldsBarts Cancer Institute-A CR-UK Center of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Center, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6075-1808
Beatriz de Luxán-DelgadoBarts Cancer Institute-A CR-UK Center of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Center, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom.
Oscar MaiquesBarts Cancer Institute-A CR-UK Center of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Center, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom.
Laura WisniewskiBarts Cancer Institute-A CR-UK Center of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Center, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom.
Emma NewportBarts Cancer Institute-A CR-UK Center of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Center, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom.
Vinothini RajeeveBarts Cancer Institute-A CR-UK Center of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Center, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6361-4291
Rebecca J G DrakeBarts Cancer Institute-A CR-UK Center of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Center, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1206-6053
Jesús Gómez-EscuderoBarts Cancer Institute-A CR-UK Center of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Center, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom.
Frances M RichardsTranslational Medicine Operations, Astrazeneca Oncology, Darwin Building, Cambridge Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7947-7853
Céline WellerDepartment of Dermatology, Section of Clinical and Molecular Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center and European Center for Angioscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Christof DormannDepartment of Dermatology, Section of Clinical and Molecular Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center and European Center for Angioscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Ya-Ming MengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for RNA Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Peter B VermeulenDepartment of Oncological Research, Translational Cancer Research Unit, Oncology Center GZA-GZA Hospitals St. Augustinus and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Dieter SaurDivision of Translational Cancer Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg and Chair of Translational Cancer Research and Institute for Experimental Cancer Therapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5874-0210
Victoria Sanz-MorenoBarts Cancer Institute-A CR-UK Center of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Center, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5096-9456
Ping-Pui WongGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for RNA Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1592-4823
Cyrill GéraudDepartment of Dermatology, Section of Clinical and Molecular Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center and European Center for Angioscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Pedro R CutillasBarts Cancer Institute-A CR-UK Center of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Center, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3426-2274
Kairbaan Hodivala-DilkeBarts Cancer Institute-A CR-UK Center of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Center, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2859-749X
Queen Mary University of London · GBHeidelberg University · DESun Yat-sen University · CNAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBGerman Cancer Research Center · DEGZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus · BE

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/18/75/34096Cancer Research UK 12007Cancer Research UK 18673Cancer Research UK 24478Cancer Research UK C14303/A17197Cancer Research UK C15966/A24375Cancer Research UK C16420/A18066Cancer Research UK C33043/A24478Cancer Research UK C9545/A29580Medical Research Council MR/V009621/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite substantial advances in the treatment of solid cancers, resistance to therapy remains a major obstacle to prolonged progression-free survival. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive cancers, with a high level of liver metastasis. Primary PDAC is highly hypoxic, and metastases are resistant to first-line treatment, including gemcitabine. Recent studies have indicated that endothelial cell (EC) focal adhesion kinase (FAK) regulates DNA-damaging therapy-induced angiocrine factors and chemosensitivity in primary tumor models. Here, we show that inducible loss of EC-FAK in both orthotopic and spontaneous mouse models of PDAC is not sufficient to affect primary tumor growth but reduces liver and lung metastasis load and improves survival rates in gemcitabine-treated, but not untreated, mice. EC-FAK loss did not affect primary tumor angiogenesis, tumor blood vessel leakage, or early events in metastasis, including the numbers of circulating tumor cells, tumor cell homing, or metastatic seeding. Phosphoproteomics analysis showed a downregulation of the MAPK, RAF, and PAK signaling pathways in gemcitabine-treated FAK-depleted ECs compared with gemcitabine-treated wild-type ECs. Moreover, low levels of EC-FAK correlated with increased survival and reduced relapse in gemcitabine-treated patients with PDAC, supporting the clinical relevance of these findings. Altogether, we have identified a new role of EC-FAK in regulating PDAC metastasis upon gemcitabine treatment that impacts outcome. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings establish the potential utility of combinatorial endothelial cell FAK targeting together with gemcitabine in future clinical applications to control metastasis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsAnimalsCell Line, TumorDeoxycytidineEndothelial CellsFocal Adhesion Protein-Tyrosine KinasesGemcitabineHumansMiceNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalDeoxycytidineFocal Adhesion Protein-Tyrosine KinasesGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID35350066
PMCPMC9381116
OpenAlexW4220902055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.