Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35349752›Full record

ReviewImmunity, inflammation and disease2022

Oral and intranasal vaccines against SARS-CoV-2: Current progress, prospects, advantages, and challenges.

Sanchita Kar, Popy Devnath, Talha B Emran, Trina E Tallei, Saikat Mitra, Kuldeep Dhama

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. mRNA Vaccines for Influenza: Hope for a Universal Vaccine?BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. COVID-19 and Diarylamidines: The Parasitic Connection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Sanchita KarDepartment of Infectious Disease, Institute of Developing Science and Health Initiatives, ECB Chattar, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Popy DevnathDepartment of Microbiology, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali, Bangladesh.
Talha B EmranDepartment of Pharmacy, BGC Trust University Bangladesh, Chittagong, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-3188-2272
Trina E TalleiDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado, North Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Saikat MitraDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kuldeep DhamaDivision of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies · BDBGC Trust University Bangladesh · BDIndian Veterinary Research Institute · INNoakhali Science and Technology University · BDSam Ratulangi University · IDUniversity of Dhaka · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a deadly pandemic in the 21st century, resulting in many deaths, economic loss, and international immobility. Vaccination represents the only mechanism to defeat this virus. Several intramuscular vaccines have been approved and are currently used worldwide. MAIN BODY: However, global mass vaccination has not been achieved owing to several limitations, including the need for expertise to administer the injection-based vaccine, improper distribution of the vaccine, and lack of cold chain facilities, particularly in resource-poor, low-income countries. Mucosal vaccines are typically administered either orally or nasally, and several studies have shown promising results for developing these vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 that might serve as viable alternatives to current vaccines. SARS-CoV-2 invades the human body via oral and nasal mucosal surfaces; thus, an oral or nasal vaccine can trigger the immune system to inhibit the virus at the mucosal level, preventing further transmission via a strong mucosal and systematic immune response. Although several approaches toward developing a mucosal vaccine are currently being tested, additional attention is required.

conclusionIn this article, the current approaches used to develop effective oral and nasal mucosal vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and their benefits, prospects, and challenges have been summarized.

Indexed as

COVID-19Viral VaccinesAdministration, IntranasalCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesViral VaccinesCOVID-19intranasal vaccinesmass vaccinationmucosal vaccinesoral vaccinesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35349752
PMCPMC8959423
OpenAlexW4221088232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.