ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2022
RUMA and RUPCR in children with Henoch-Schonlein purpura.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- RUMA and RUPCR in children with Henoch-Schonlein purpura.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the qualitative and quantitative targets in the detection of proteinuria in children with HSP.
methodsThree hundred and forty children were taken as the research subjects. Qualitative and a series of quantitative indicators of urine protein were tested.
resultsThe qualitative and quantitative of protein in 340 children were analyzed retrospectively. Correlation analysis found that 24hUTP had a strong correlation with age, RUMA, RUPCR, and qualitative urine occult blood (p < 0.01, for all). After regression analysis, RUMA and RUPCR were still significantly correlated with 24hUTP (p < 0.01). At the same time, RUMA and RUPCR had good diagnostic accuracy for proteinuria. When the RUPCR ratio was set as 0.415, the diagnostic sensitivity was 83%, and the specificity was 98.7%. When RUMA was set as 68.215, the sensitivity was 94.3% and the specificity was 96.2%.
conclusionCompared with 24hUTP, RUMA and RUPCR had high sensitivity and specificity for monitoring proteinuria in children with HSP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.