Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35349722›Full record

SynthesisAggressive behavior2022

Testing effects of social rejection on aggressive and prosocial behavior: A meta-analysis.

Megan Quarmley, Julia Feldman, Hannah Grossman, Tessa Clarkson, Anne Moyer, Johanna M Jarcho

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aggressive behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megan QuarmleyDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Julia FeldmanDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Hannah GrossmanDepartment of Counseling, School, and Educational Psychology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Tessa ClarksonDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Anne MoyerDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Johanna M JarchoDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9075-6968

Funding

Using Adolescent Nonverbal Behavior to Predict Aggression Against Bullies and BystandersR21HD093912 · NICHD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI JARCHO, JOHANNA MOLLY · 2018 to 2019
$426k
Learning to fear social interactions: Dysregulated neural mechanisms of social learning in adolescent social anxietyF31MH122091 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI CLARKSON, TESSA · 2020 to 2021
$65k
Neural Mechanisms of Social Rejection elicited Aggression in AdolescenceF31MH125478 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI QUARMLEY, MEGAN · 2021 to 2022
$61k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD093912NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH122091NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH125478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social rejection elicits profound feelings of distress. From an evolutionary perspective, the best way to alleviate this distress is to behave prosocially, minimizing the likelihood of further exclusion. Yet, examples ranging from the playground to the pub suggest rejection commonly elicits aggression. Opposing theoretical perspectives and discordant empirical results have left a basic question unanswered: does rejection more commonly elicit prosocial or aggressive behavior? We conducted three meta-analyses (one with studies measuring aggressive behavior; one with studies measuring prosocial behavior; and one with studies measuring both aggressive and prosocial behavior; N = 3864) to quantify: (1) the extent to which social rejection elicits prosocial or aggressive behavior and (2) potential moderating effects on these relations. Random-effects models revealed medium effects such that social rejection potentiated aggressive behavior (k = 19; d = 0.41, p < .0001) and attenuated prosocial behavior (k = 7; d = 0.59, p < .0001), an effect that remained consistent even when participants were given the option to behave prosocially or aggressively (k =  15; d = 0.71, p < .0001). These results cast doubt on the theory that rejection triggers prosocial behavior, and instead suggest it is a robust elicitor of aggression. Statement of Relevance: To our knowledge, these meta-analyses are the first to directly test whether social rejection elicits aggressive or prosocial behavior. By including a comprehensive collection of both published and unpublished research studies, and examining a wide variety of previously untested moderators, we show that social rejection robustly elicits aggressive behavior and inhibits prosocial behavior. Additionally, we demonstrate that aggressive behavior following social rejection is not simply a function of limited choices in response options. In fact, aggressive behavior was evoked even when the option to engage in prosocial behavior was provided. Furthermore, we conducted a comprehensive narrative review of the neural mechanisms underlying social rejection-elicited aggressive and prosocial behavior to supplement primary analyses. Overall, we believe that our work makes a critical theoretical contribution to the field.

Indexed as

AltruismSocial BehaviorAggressionHumansSocial IsolationSocial Statusaggressionmeta-analysisprosocialreviewsocial rejection

Identifiers

PMID35349722
PMCPMC9519812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.