Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35349695›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2022

Correcting Bias in Allele Frequency Estimates Due to an Observation Threshold: A Markov Chain Analysis.

Toni I Gossmann, David Waxman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Toni I GossmannDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6609-4116
David WaxmanCentre for Computational Systems Biology, ISTBI, Fudan University, 220 Handan Road, Shanghai 20433, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9093-2108

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are many problems in biology and related disciplines involving stochasticity, where a signal can only be detected when it lies above a threshold level, while signals lying below threshold are simply not detected. A consequence is that the detected signal is conditioned to lie above threshold, and is not representative of the actual signal. In this work, we present some general results for the conditioning that occurs due to the existence of such an observational threshold. We show that this conditioning is relevant, for example, to gene-frequency trajectories, where many loci in the genome are simultaneously measured in a given generation. Such a threshold can lead to severe biases of allele frequency estimates under purifying selection. In the analysis presented, within the context of Markov chains such as the Wright-Fisher model, we address two key questions: (1) "What is a natural measure of the strength of the conditioning associated with an observation threshold?" (2) "What is a principled way to correct for the effects of the conditioning?". We answer the first question in terms of a proportion. Starting with a large number of trajectories, the relevant quantity is the proportion of these trajectories that are above threshold at a later time and hence are detected. The smaller the value of this proportion, the stronger the effects of conditioning. We provide an approximate analytical answer to the second question, that corrects the bias produced by an observation threshold, and performs to reasonable accuracy in the Wright-Fisher model for biologically plausible parameter values.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationModels, GeneticBiasGene FrequencyMarkov ChainsSelection, Geneticconditioned observationsmissing valuespopulation genetics theoryrandom genetic driftstochastic population dynamicsWright–Fisher model

Identifiers

PMID35349695
PMCPMC9016752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.