Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35349601›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Effect of differences in light source environment on transcriptome of leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) to optimize cultivation conditions.

Soichiro Nagano, Naoya Mori, Yukiko Tomari, Noriko Mitsugi, Ayumi Deguchi, Makoto Kashima, Ayumi Tezuka, Atsushi J Nagano, Hitohide Usami, Takanari Tanabata and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soichiro NaganoDepartment of Advanced Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Tamagawa University, Machida, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7933-653X
Naoya MoriTamagawa University Research Institute, Machida, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukiko TomariTamagawa University Research Institute, Machida, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko MitsugiDepartment of Advanced Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Tamagawa University, Machida, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayumi DeguchiResearch Institute for Food and Agriculture, Ryukoku University, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Makoto KashimaResearch Institute for Food and Agriculture, Ryukoku University, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Ayumi TezukaResearch Institute for Food and Agriculture, Ryukoku University, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Atsushi J NaganoResearch Institute for Food and Agriculture, Ryukoku University, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Hitohide UsamiTamagawa University Research Institute, Machida, Tokyo, Japan.
Takanari TanabataDepartment of Advanced Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Tamagawa University, Machida, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki WatanabeDepartment of Advanced Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Tamagawa University, Machida, Tokyo, Japan.
Tamagawa University · JPRyukoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When used in closed-type plant factories, light-emitting diode (LED) illumination systems have the particular advantages of low heat emission and high luminous efficiency. The effects of illumination quality and intensity on the growth and morphogenesis of many plant species have been examined, but improvements are needed to optimize the illumination systems for better plant products with lower resource investments. In particular, new strategies are needed to reduce the wastage of plant products related to leaf senescence, and to better control the ingredients and appearance of leafy vegetables. Although the quality of light is often altered to change the characteristics of plant products, the transcriptional status underlying the physiological responses of plants to light has not been established. Herein, we performed a comprehensive gene expression analysis using RNA-sequencing to determine how red, blue, and red/blue LEDs and fluorescent light sources affect transcriptome involved in the leaf aging of leaf lettuce. The RNA-sequencing profiling revealed clear differences in the transcriptome between young and old leaves. Red LED light caused large variation between the two age classes, while a pure or mixed blue LED light spectrum induced fewer transcriptome differences between young and old leaves. Collectively, the expression levels of genes that showed homology with those of other model organisms provide a detailed physiological overview, incorporating such characteristics as the senescence, nutrient deficiency, and anthocyanin synthesis of the leaf lettuce plants. Our findings suggest that transcriptome profiles of leaf lettuce grown under different light sources provide helpful information to achieve better growth conditions for marketable and efficient green-vegetable production, with improved wastage control and efficient nutrient inputs.

Indexed as

LactucaTranscriptomeNutrientsPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesRNANutrientsRNA

Identifiers

PMID35349601
PMCPMC8963549
OpenAlexW4225746567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.