Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35349488›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2022

Cardiac pericyte reprogramming by MEK inhibition promotes arteriologenesis and angiogenesis of the ischemic heart.

Elisa Avolio, Rajesh Katare, Anita C Thomas, Andrea Caporali, Daryl Schwenke, Michele Carrabba, Marco Meloni, Massimo Caputo, Paolo Madeddu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. GLP-1 activates KNature communications · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Hypertension research 2024 update and perspectives: basic research.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Pericytes in the disease spotlight.Trends in cell biology · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Biology and function of pericytes in the vascular microcirculation.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisa AvolioBristol Medical School, Translational Health Sciences, and Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Rajesh KatareDepartment of Physiology, HeartOtago, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Anita C ThomasBristol Medical School, Translational Health Sciences, and Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Andrea CaporaliUniversity/BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Daryl SchwenkeDepartment of Physiology, HeartOtago, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Michele CarrabbaBristol Medical School, Translational Health Sciences, and Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Marco MeloniUniversity/BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Massimo CaputoBristol Medical School, Translational Health Sciences, and Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Paolo MadedduBristol Medical School, Translational Health Sciences, and Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
NIHR Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/17/1/32804British Heart Foundation PG/16/58/32275British Heart Foundation PG/22/10916British Heart Foundation RM/17/3/33381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pericytes (PCs) are abundant yet remain the most enigmatic and ill-defined cell population in the heart. Here, we investigated whether PCs can be reprogrammed to aid neovascularization. Primary PCs from human and mouse hearts acquired cytoskeletal proteins typical of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) upon exclusion of EGF/bFGF, which signal through ERK1/2, or upon exposure to the MEK inhibitor PD0325901. Differentiated PCs became more proangiogenic, more responsive to vasoactive agents, and insensitive to chemoattractants. RNA sequencing revealed transcripts marking the PD0325901-induced transition into proangiogenic, stationary VSMC-like cells, including the unique expression of 2 angiogenesis-related markers, aquaporin 1 (AQP1) and cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 2 (CRABP2), which were further verified at the protein level. This enabled us to trace PCs during in vivo studies. In mice, implantation of Matrigel plugs containing human PCs plus PD0325901 promoted the formation of αSMA+ neovessels compared with PC only. Two-week oral administration of PD0325901 to mice increased the heart arteriolar density, total vascular area, arteriole coverage by PDGFRβ+AQP1+CRABP2+ PCs, and myocardial perfusion. Short-duration PD0325901 treatment of mice after myocardial infarction enhanced the peri-infarct vascularization, reduced the scar, and improved systolic function. In conclusion, myocardial PCs have intrinsic plasticity that can be pharmacologically modulated to promote reparative vascularization of the ischemic heart.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PathologicPericytesAnimalsBenzamidesIschemiaMiceMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesMyocardiumNeovascularization, PhysiologicBenzamidesMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesAngiogenesisCardiovascular diseaseMicrocirculationMolecular biologyVascular Biology

Identifiers

PMID35349488
PMCPMC9106362
OpenAlexW4221012258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.