ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022
Evaluating the Impacts of Patient Engagement on Health Services Research Teams: Lessons from the Veteran Consulting Network.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Promising Patient-Engagement Practices Used by National Research Networks at the US Veterans Health Administration: Perspectives of Veterans, Staff, and Research Leaders.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Development of a patient advocate committee for a pediatric biobank.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- A Case Study of Veteran Patient-Researcher Partnerships in Mental Health Research and Practice: Three Recommendations From a Veteran Patient Engaged in Research (VPER).Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Incorporating Patient Input into the Target Product Profile.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Low-cost generation of clinical-grade, layperson-friendly pharmacogenetic passports using oligonucleotide arrays.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Measuring and Demonstrating the Value of Patient Engagement Across the Medicines Lifecycle: A Patient Engagement Impact Measurement Framework.The patient · 2025Article
- Investigating the Best Practices for Engagement in Remote Participatory Design: Mixed Methods Analysis of 4 Remote Studies With Family Caregivers.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Evidence-based practice in radiography: A strategy for shifting our culture.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2024Article
- Patient engagement in a Canadian health research funding institute: implementation and impact.BMJ open · 2024Review
- Article
- Experiences and lessons learned from a patient-engagement service established by a national research consortium in the U.S. Veterans Health Administration.Learning health systems · 2024Article
- Measuring the Impact of Patient Engagement in Health Research: An Exploratory Study Using Multiple Survey Tools.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2024Article
- Exploring the outcomes of research engagement using the observation method in an online setting.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Patient engagement in health implementation research: A logic model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- A Foundation for Patient-Centered Core Impact Sets: Key Learnings from Past and Existing Approaches.The patient · 2023Article
- Towards a framework for patient-centred care coordination: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Leveraging the timing and frequency of patient decision aids in longitudinal shared decision-making: A narrative review and applied model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Review
- Patient and Veteran Engagement in Health Research: the Emergence of a Field of Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- The impacts of partnering with cancer patients in palliative care research: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.Palliative care and social practice · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite increasing commitment to patient engagement in research, evaluation of the impact of these efforts on research processes, products, and teams is limited.
objectiveTo explore the impacts of engaging patients as consultants to research studies by examining the experiences, impacts, and lessons learned from a program facilitating patient engagement at a Veterans Health Administration research center.
designWe developed a logic model to articulate the activities being implemented to support patient engagement and their anticipated outcomes. Then, we conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews with participants in the local Veteran Consulting Network to qualitatively explore these outcomes.
participantsTwelve researchers and eleven Veteran patients with experience working on at least one grant or funded study. APPROACH: Interview transcripts were inductively coded using a consensus-based approach. Findings were synthesized using framework analysis and mapped back onto our logic model of expected patient engagement impacts. KEY
resultsPatient engagement improved the perceived quality and relevance of research studies as patient consultants challenged researchers' assumptions about patient populations and clinical contexts and gave feedback that helped improve the feasibility of proposed grants, readability of study materials, comprehensiveness of study assessments, and cultural sensitivity and relevance of interventions. Patient engagement also had personal benefits to researchers and patients. Researchers reported improved communication skills and higher job satisfaction. Patients reported a sense of purpose and satisfaction from their work with greater awareness of and appreciation for research.
conclusionsEngaging patients in research can have multiple benefits to the people and work involved. Our evaluation process can serve as a template for other organizations to plan for and assess the impact of their own patient engagement programs. Creating logic models and updating them based on feedback from program users make engagement goals explicit, help verify expected mechanisms to achieve impact, and facilitate organizational learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.