ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022
Involving Stakeholders as Communication Partners in Research Dissemination Efforts.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Body image resources for parents of youth: a scoping review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Patient Engagement Activities and Infrastructure Among US Veterans Affairs National Research Networks.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Dissemination strategies for the national scale-up of a school-based physical activity initiative: insights from education and health sector partner organizations.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Optimization of care and recovery in older colorectal cancer surgery patients: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation pilot study protocol.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
- "More Than My Own Effort": A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing EBP Competence Among Traditional Chinese Medicine Specialist Nurses.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Demonstrating Feasibility of Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS)-Guided Inpatient Transthoracic Echo Triage Decision Pathway.POCUS journal · 2025Article
- A multi-level implementation strategy to increase adoption of chiropractic care for low back pain in primary care clinics: a randomized stepped-wedge pilot study protocol.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 testing and vaccination: a qualitative focus group study among Rhode Island's Latine/Hispanic community.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Co-designing a blueprint for spreading person-centered, Whole Health care to HIV specialty care settings: a mixed methods protocol.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Researcher and partner perspectives on the relationship between engagement in research and three uses of patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness research study findings.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Optimizing intervention dissemination at scale: A qualitative study of multi-sector partner organization experiences.Translational behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Improving Concussion Education: Do Athletic Trainers' Opinions Match Expert Consensus?Journal of athletic training · 2024Article
- Cervical cancer prevention in Burkina Faso: a stakeholder's collaboration for the development of awareness messaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Increasing consumer engagement: tools to engage service users in quality improvement or implementation efforts.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
- Commentary: Engaging healthcare staff and stakeholders in healthcare simulation modeling to better translate research into health impact: A systematic review.Frontiers in health services · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Moving evidence into practice requires the support of stakeholders, who are critical actors in the research process. Yet, research teams need strategies for determining who these stakeholders are, what their roles should be, and how to involve them in research and dissemination activities. In this Perspective, we discuss steps for identifying, categorizing, and including stakeholders in the research process, as a precursor to involving them as communication partners in research dissemination efforts. Effectively communicating the results of research is critical for increasing stakeholders' buy-in for the adoption and sustainment of this evidence. However, this communication is best if it comes from the end-users themselves, the stakeholders, who have a specified involvement in the research process. Combining elements from dissemination, implementation, and management science literature, we identify specific tools and strategies for researchers to (1) understand the roles of various stakeholders potentially impacted by their work, and (2) recognize the specific communication activities these stakeholders could be engaged in, to support the dissemination of research findings. We present a 3-Step Plan for identifying, categorizing, and involving stakeholders in the research process in a way that will lead to their role as communication partners when results are ready to be disseminated widely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.