ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022
Operationalizing Stakeholder Engagement Through the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Charter (SCEC).
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Common sense oncology values to action: a patient-led framework for randomized clinical trial design.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Lessons Learned From the Implementation of a Pragmatic Trial Evaluating Non-Pharmacological Approaches to Dementia Care in US Nursing Homes.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Charters in Patient-Engaged Research: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence.Public health challenges · 2025Review
- Establishing Effective Patient Engagement Through a Terms of Reference to Foster Inclusivity and Empowerment in Research: Example From a Healthcare Transition Quality Indicators Project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Combining Federated Machine Learning and Qualitative Methods to Investigate Novel Pediatric Asthma Subtypes: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Reporting of equity in observational epidemiology: A methodological review.Journal of global health · 2024Review
- Examining how study teams manage different viewpoints and priorities in patient-centered outcomes research: Results of an embedded multiple case study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Patient and Veteran Engagement in Health Research: the Emergence of a Field of Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Context-specific adaptation of an eHealth-facilitated, integrated care model and tailoring its implementation strategies-A mixed-methods study as a part of the SMILe implementation science project.Frontiers in health services · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a need for clear strategies and procedures to operationalize stakeholder engagement in research studies. Clear guidelines that promote shared leadership among study investigators and research stakeholders are important for inclusive and sustainable partnerships. Such guidelines may take the form of a governance charter and can be a means for encouraging the participation and inclusion of stakeholders who may have little to no experience with research or are otherwise underrepresented in research. This perspective article presents the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Charter (SCEC), one effort to operationalize a stakeholder engagement approach between researchers and an advisory committee as guided by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's (PCORI) Research Engagement Principles (i.e., reciprocal relationships, partnerships, co-learning, transparency-honesty-trust). Building on the SCEC can help future investigators develop a study-specific, dynamic, governance document outlining advisory committee and research team preferences in areas such as role expectations, study governance, and decision-making procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.