Observational studyJapanese journal of ophthalmology2022
Multicenter prospective observational study of fungal keratitis in Japan: analyses of in vitro susceptibility tests for combinations of drugs.
Observational study in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fungal keratitis caused by a dematiaceous Pleosporales member following ocular trauma with a wooden fragment: a case report.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2026Article
- Association between fungal growth temperature and corneal lesions in fungal keratitis: a case series.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Antifungal susceptibility profiles for fungal isolates from corneas and contact lenses in the United Kingdom.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Multicenter prospective observational study of fungal keratitis in Japan: analyses of culture-positive cases.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the effects of a combination of two antifungal drugs against causative fungi of fungal keratitis in Japan. STUDY
designMulticenter prospective observational study.
methodsEighteen isolates of yeast-like fungi and 22 isolates of filamentous fungi collected by the Multicenter Prospective Observational Study of Fungal Keratitis in Japan were studied. Specially manufactured minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) measurement plates were used to test the effectiveness of 10 combinations of two antifungal drugs against the isolates. The combinations were pimaricin (PMR) + voriconazole (VRCZ), PMR + fluconazole (FLCZ), PMR + miconazole (MCZ), PMR + micafungin (MCFG), VRCZ + FLCZ, VRCZ + MCZ, VRCZ + MCFG, VRCZ + amphotericin-B (AMPH-B), MCZ + FLCZ, and MCZ + MCFG. The checkerboard microdilution method was used, and the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index was calculated based on the guidelines of The Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).
resultsIn yeast-like fungi, additive effects were observed between PMR and MCFG in 77.8% of the isolates, and they were also observed between the azoles. Synergistic effects were observed on 11.1% of the isolates for MCZ and FLCZ. On the other hand, antagonistic effects were present between PMR and azoles with 88.9% between PMR and VRCZ, 72.2% between PMR and FLCZ, and 94.4% between PMR and MCZ. In filamentous fungi, additive effects were observed between PMR and MCFG in 40.9% of the isolates, and between VRCZ and MCZ in 40.9% of the isolates. Antagonistic effects were observed for PMR and the azoles.
conclusionsThe combination of drugs prescribed for fungal keratitis incurs a possibility of synergistic, additive, indifferent, or antagonistic effects, depending on drug combinations and fungal strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.