Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35348924›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine - open2022

The Effects of High-Intensity Multimodal Training in Apparently Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review.

Tijana Sharp, Clementine Grandou, Aaron J Coutts, Lee Wallace

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine - open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06242223 (Effects of Multimodal High Intensity Interval Training on Speed, Agility and Performance Level in Cricket Players), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06242223 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Multimodal High Intensity Interval Training on Speed, Agility and Performance Level in Cricket Players

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled36ConditionsHigh Intensity Interval TrainingArmsMultimodal HIIT, conventional HIIT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Physiological effects of regular CrossFitFrontiers in physiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tijana SharpSport and Exercise Discipline Group, University of Technology, Sydney Human Performance Research Centre, Moore Park, Sydney, Australia. tijana.sharp@uts.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6878-6343
Clementine GrandouSport and Exercise Discipline Group, University of Technology, Sydney Human Performance Research Centre, Moore Park, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3161-0579
Aaron J CouttsSport and Exercise Discipline Group, University of Technology, Sydney Human Performance Research Centre, Moore Park, Sydney, Australia.
Lee WallaceSport and Exercise Discipline Group, University of Technology, Sydney Human Performance Research Centre, Moore Park, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-intensity multimodal training (HIMT) is emerging as a popular training method that combines aerobic and resistance training throughout a single exercise session. The current literature is limited by a lack of terminology that broadly encompasses all styles of combined aerobic and resistance training. The magnitude of chronic or long-term (i.e.  ≥ 4 weeks) effects of HIMT participation on aerobic and muscular fitness also remains unclear. Additionally, one of many complex reasons for the growing popularity of HIMT may be attributed to the affective response to exercise, namely levels of enjoyment. However, this concept is not yet well understood across all styles of HIMT. A comprehensive systematic review is required to synthesise the available literature and attempt to provide an operational definition of HIMT to capture the breadth of combined training styles that exist.

objectiveThe objective of this systematic review was to determine the chronic effects of HIMT participation on aerobic and muscular fitness and to compare HIMT to established concurrent training methods. Enjoyability and other adherence-related subjective responses were also examined in HIMT participants. This review critically assessed the level of evidence and feasibility of current HIMT guidelines.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus to identify studies up until March 2021.

resultsA total of 20 studies were included for review. Studies generally reported moderate to large effects on aerobic fitness and subjective responses in favour of HIMT interventions. Mixed outcomes were demonstrated in muscular fitness. These results should be treated with caution due to high risk of bias among included studies.

conclusionsFew studies have assessed the chronic effects of HIMT participation on aerobic, and musculoskeletal adaptations and subjective responses, in particular exercise enjoyment. Research conclusions are limited by heterogeneity of experimental protocols and outcome measures. Furthermore, the inability of the literature to make adequate comparisons between various styles of HIMT and other concurrent training protocols limits understandings of the efficacy of HIMT. Registration This systematic review was registered on the Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/2RE4B; 26 March 2021).

Indexed as

Aerobic fitnessHigh-intensityMultimodal trainingMuscular fitnessSubjective responses

Identifiers

PMID35348924
PMCPMC8964907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.