Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35348911›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2022

The effects of cognitive load and encoding modality on prospective memory.

Guangzheng Li, Mei Li, Jin Wang, Zhanyu Yu, Hangjie Ma, Bing Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guangzheng LiSchool of Education Science, Jiangsu Normal University, No. 101 Shanghai Street. 221116, Xuzhou, China. psyliz@sina.com.
Mei LiSchool of Education Science, Jiangsu Normal University, No. 101 Shanghai Street. 221116, Xuzhou, China.
Jin WangSchool of Education Science, Jiangsu Normal University, No. 101 Shanghai Street. 221116, Xuzhou, China.
Zhanyu YuSchool of Education Science, Jiangsu Normal University, No. 101 Shanghai Street. 221116, Xuzhou, China.
Hangjie MaSchool of Education Science, Jiangsu Normal University, No. 101 Shanghai Street. 221116, Xuzhou, China.
Bing LiDepartment of Psychology, Jinlin University, No. 2699 Qianjin Street, Changchun, Jilin, China. l_bing@jlu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful execution of an intention as planned is necessary for people's normal life. However, people sometimes even forget intentions that they consider as very important. Hence, the issues that whether prospective memory performance can be improved under high cognitive load tasks are worth discussing. In this study, we used a 2 (cognitive load: high or standard) × 2 (encoding modality: verbal or enactment encoding) mixed design to explore the effects of encoding modality and cognitive load of ongoing tasks on prospective memory. The results showed that the prospective memory performance under high cognitive load condition was significantly worse than that under standard cognitive load condition for verbal encoding condition. However, for enactment encoding condition, enactment encoding enhanced the performance and abolished the difference between high and low cognitive load effects on prospective memory. Strategic issues of prospective memory will be discussed.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicCognitionHumansIntentionMental RecallCognitive loadEnactment encodingMulti-process theoryProspective memoryVerbal encoding

Identifiers

PMID35348911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.