ReviewClinical oral investigations2022
Effect of an educational intervention among Lebanese dentists on antibiotic prescribing: a randomized controlled study.
Review in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Multifaceted and educational interventions to improve prescribing indicators in the Middle East and North Africa Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Dental Antibiotic Stewardship Interventions.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2025Pooled it
- Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in dental practice: results of two clinical audits conducted at a university hospital.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Co-Producing an Intervention to Reduce Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing Among Dental Practitioners in India.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate whether an educational intervention could improve antibiotic prescribing among Lebanese dentists and assess antibiotic prescribing patterns regarding international guidelines. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn interventional randomized controlled trial was conducted from the first of April to the end of August 2017. This was an oral presentation of about 20 min based on a review of the literature and the international guidelines. Sixty dentists specializing in oral dental surgery or general practitioners participated in this study. All the patients who took a consultation over 2 months were involved.
resultsIn this study, 950 antibiotic prescriptions were analyzed. A change was found only in antibiotics prescribed for tooth extraction and tooth extraction (impacted tooth). The intervention was impactful in raising the mean percentage of prescriptions compliant with indication and with the choice regarding antibiotics prescribed for prophylactic reasons. A dentist in the intervention group would have after the intervention period a mean percentage of prescriptions compliant with indication and with choice of 31.7% and 20.7%, respectively, above one in the control group. Despite the decrease in the overall number of antibiotics prescribed by dentists in the intervention group over time, this does not suggest that this was solely due to the effect of the intervention.
conclusionThis study highlights the importance of continuing medical education to optimize antibiotic use in dentistry. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study can serve as the basis for a future audit, training, and feedback intervention to increase dentists' awareness of recommended guidelines and optimal antibiotic use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35348880What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.