Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35348837›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2022

Risk of osteoporosis and fracture after hysterectomies without oophorectomies: a systematic review and pooled analysis.

Weifang Xu, Weizhou Wu, Suqing Yang, Tingting Chen, Xiao Teng, Danping Gao, Shankun Zhao

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Weifang Xu *Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China.
Weizhou Wu *Department of Urology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, Guangdong, China.
Suqing Yang *Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China.
Tingting ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China.
Xiao TengDepartment of Orthopedics, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China.
Danping GaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China.
Shankun ZhaoDepartment of Urology, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China. zhaoshankun@tzc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0305-3912
Taizhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study provides evidence that women who underwent hysterectomy without oophorectomies are at a higher risk of osteoporosis and bone fractures than the general population. Early interventions for these susceptible women may help to delay or reduce the risk of osteoporosis and bone fractures.

introductionMounting studies have shown that patients with hysterectomy are at high risk of developing osteoporosis or bone fractures, but the evidence from all the relevant studies has not been previously synthesized. The present study aims to investigate whether women with hysterectomy without oophorectomies have a prominently higher prevalence of osteoporosis or fractures than healthy subjects.

methodsFour electronic databases were systematically searched to identify the eligible studies. The combined effect was assessed by calculating the relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). More methodologies for this study were available in the PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021227255).

resultsFinally, three observational studies offering osteoporosis cases and two retrospective studies reporting fracture cases were included. One eligible study has provided independent data from three groups of fractures. Synthetic results revealed that hysterectomy without oophorectomies was significantly associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis as compared to the general population (combined RR from three studies = 1.47, 95%CI 1.253 to 1.725, P < 0.001; heterogeneity, I

conclusionsThis is the first study to quantify the association between hysterectomy without oophorectomies and osteoporosis/fracture risk through a meta-analysis and has subsequently confirmed its positive relationship. Additional large-sample rigorously prospective cohorts are still warranted to validate the present evidence.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesFemaleHumansHysterectomyOvariectomyProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesFractureHysterectomyOsteoporosisPooled analysisRisk

Identifiers

PMID35348837
OpenAlexW4220907311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.