Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35348793›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2022

Inequity in Telemedicine Use Among Patients with Cancer in the Deep South During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Connie C Shao, M Chandler McLeod, Lauren T Gleason, Isabel C Dos Santos Marques, Daniel I Chu, Eric L Wallace, Mona N Fouad, Sushanth Reddy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Connie C ShaoUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Surgery, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9932-0271
M Chandler McLeodUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Surgery, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Lauren T GleasonUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Surgery, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Isabel C Dos Santos MarquesUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Surgery, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Daniel I ChuUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Surgery, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Eric L WallaceUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Mona N FouadUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Sushanth ReddyUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Surgery, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4150-9458
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

UAB Health Services Research (HSR) Training ProgramT32HS013852 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LEVITAN, EMILY B, MUGAVERO, MICHAEL J · 2003 to 2024
$8.0M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS013852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemedicine use has increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. It remains unclear if its rapid growth exacerbates disparities in healthcare access. We aimed to characterize telemedicine use among a large oncology population in the Deep South during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed at the only National Cancer Institute designated-cancer center in Alabama March 2020 to December 2020. With a diverse (26.5% Black, 61% rural) population, this southeastern demographic uniquely reflects historically vulnerable populations. All non-procedural visits at the cancer center from March to December 2020 were included in this study excluding those with a department that had fewer than 100 visits during this time period. Patient and clinic level characteristics were analyzed using t-test and Chi-square to compare characteristics between visit types (in-person versus telemedicine, and video versus audio within telemedicine). Generalized estimating equations were used to identify independent factors associated with telemedicine use and type of telemedicine use.

resultsThere were 50 519 visits and most were in-person (81.3%). Among telemedicine visits, most were phone based (58.3%). Black race and male sex predicted in-person visits. Telemedicine visits were less likely to have video among patients who were Black, older, male, publicly insured, and from lower income areas.

conclusionsTelemedicine use, specifically with video, is significantly lower among historically vulnerable populations. Understanding barriers to telemedicine use and preferred modalities of communication among different populations will help inform insurance reimbursement and interventions at different socioecological levels to ensure the continued evolution of telemedicine is equitable.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsTelemedicineHumansMalePandemicsRetrospective Studieshealthcare disparitieshealth services accessibilityminority healthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35348793
PMCPMC9255978
OpenAlexW4213298623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.