Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35348768›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2022

Sinful pleasures and pious woes? Using fMRI to examine evaluative and hedonic emotion knowledge.

Kent M Lee, SuhJin Lee, Ajay B Satpute

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kent M LeeDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6689-142X
SuhJin LeeDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9943-9253
Ajay B SatputeDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0227-0816

Funding

Fundamental subcortical mechanisms of affective processingU01CA193632 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BARRETT, LISA FELDMAN, SATPUTE, AJAY · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
Advancing understanding of neural representations of threat perception through a novel predictive coding frameworkF32MH122062 · NIMH · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, KENT M · 2020 to 2022
$201k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA193632NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH122062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, lust and pride have been considered pleasurable, yet sinful in the West. Conversely, guilt is often considered aversive, yet valuable. These emotions illustrate how evaluations about specific emotions and beliefs about their hedonic properties may often diverge. Evaluations about specific emotions may shape important aspects of emotional life (e.g. in emotion regulation, emotion experience and acquisition of emotion concepts). Yet these evaluations are often understudied in affective neuroscience. Prior work in emotion regulation, affective experience, evaluation/attitudes and decision-making point to anterior prefrontal areas as candidates for supporting evaluative emotion knowledge. Thus, we examined the brain areas associated with evaluative and hedonic emotion knowledge, with a focus on the anterior prefrontal cortex. Participants (N = 25) made evaluative and hedonic ratings about emotion knowledge during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We found that greater activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), ventromedial PFC (vmPFC) and precuneus was associated with an evaluative (vs hedonic) focus on emotion knowledge. Our results suggest that the mPFC and vmPFC, in particular, may play a role in evaluating discrete emotions.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPleasureBrainBrain MappingEmotionsHumansPrefrontal Cortexemotion conceptsemotion evaluationemotion wordsfMRI

Identifiers

PMID35348768
PMCPMC9629474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.