Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35348718›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

Developing an algorithm across integrated healthcare systems to identify a history of cancer using electronic medical records.

Jennifer C Gander, Mahesh Maiyani, Larissa L White, Andrew T Sterrett, Brianna Güney, Pamala A Pawloski, Teri DeFor, YuanYuan Olsen, Benjamin A Rybicki, Christine Neslund-Dudas and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Jennifer C GanderCenter for Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Mahesh MaiyaniInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Larissa L WhiteInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Andrew T SterrettInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Brianna GüneyCenter for Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Pamala A PawloskiHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
Teri DeForHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
YuanYuan OlsenHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
Benjamin A RybickiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Christine Neslund-DudasDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Darsheen ShethDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Richard KrajentaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Devaki PurushothamanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Stacey HondaCenter for Integrated Healthcare, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Cyndee YoneharaCenter for Integrated Healthcare, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Katrina A B GoddardDepartment of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Yolanda K PradoDepartment of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Habibul AhsanInstitute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Muhammad G KibriyaInstitute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Briseis Aschebrook-KilfoyInstitute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Chun-Hung ChanSanford Research, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA.
Sarah HagueSanford Research, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA.
Christina L ClarkeInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Brooke ThompsonInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Jennifer SawyerInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Mia M GaudetTrans Divisional Research Program, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Heather Spencer FeigelsonInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Funding

Cohort and Biobank DevelopmentZICCP010226 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI KRAFT, PETER · 2014 to 2025
$133.4M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800011CNCI NIH HHS HHSN2612018000211NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800021C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTumor registries in integrated healthcare systems (IHCS) have high precision for identifying incident cancer but often miss recently diagnosed cancers or those diagnosed outside of the IHCS. We developed an algorithm using the electronic medical record (EMR) to identify people with a history of cancer not captured in the tumor registry to identify adults, aged 40-65 years, with no history of cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe algorithm was developed at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, and then applied to 7 other IHCS. We included tumor registry data, diagnosis and procedure codes, chemotherapy files, oncology encounters, and revenue data to develop the algorithm. Each IHCS adapted the algorithm to their EMR data and calculated sensitivity and specificity to evaluate the algorithm's performance after iterative chart review.

resultsWe included data from over 1.26 million eligible people across 8 IHCS; 55 601 (4.4%) were in a tumor registry, and 44848 (3.5%) had a reported cancer not captured in a registry. The common attributes of the final algorithm at each site were diagnosis and procedure codes. The sensitivity of the algorithm at each IHCS was 90.65%-100%, and the specificity was 87.91%-100%. DISCUSSION: Relying only on tumor registry data would miss nearly half of the identified cancers. Our algorithm was robust and required only minor modifications to adapt to other EMR systems.

conclusionThis algorithm can identify cancer cases regardless of when the diagnosis occurred and may be useful for a variety of research applications or quality improvement projects around cancer care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedNeoplasmsAdultAlgorithmsData CollectionElectronic Health RecordsHumansalgorithmcancerelectronic health records

Identifiers

PMID35348718
PMCPMC9196704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.