Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35348611›Full record

Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2022

Aspirin and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer According to Genetic Susceptibility among Older Individuals.

Andrew Bakshi, Yin Cao, Suzanne G Orchard, Prudence R Carr, Amit D Joshi, Alisa K Manning, Daniel D Buchanan, Asad Umar, Ingrid M Winship, Peter Gibbs and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrew Bakshi *Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5650-7036
Yin Cao *Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Suzanne G OrchardDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0211-3183
Prudence R CarrDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5671-7236
Amit D JoshiClinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alisa K ManningClinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel D BuchananColorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2225-6675
Asad UmarDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-6239-8494
Ingrid M WinshipGenomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Center, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Peter GibbsPersonalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
John R ZalcbergDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6624-0782
Finlay MacraeGenomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Center, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
John J McNeilDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1049-5129
Paul Lacaze *Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew T Chan *Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-7284-6767
General Department of Preventive Medicine · VNMassachusetts General Hospital · USThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUJewish Hospital · USNational Cancer Institute · USWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

ASPirin in Reducing Events in the ElderlyU01AG029824 · NIA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MCNEIL, JOHN JAMES, MURRAY, ANNE M · 2009 to 2018
$64.6M
Main Administrative CoreU19AG062682 · NIA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MURRAY, ANNE M · 2019 to 2023
$42.9M
Prospective Study of the Gut Microbiome in AgingRF1AG067744 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHAN, ANDREW T · 2020 to 2020
$11.7M
Precision Prevention Research ProgramR35CA253185 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Andrew T Chan · 2020 to 2026
$6.9M
Effects of inflammaging on intestinal epithelial cells and aspirin chemoprevention.R01CA257523 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHAN, ANDREW T, STAPPENBECK, THADDEUS S · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
Optimizing the Impact of Aspirin for ChemopreventionK07CA218377 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CAO, YIN · 2018 to 2021
$504k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA218377NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257523NCI NIH HHS R35 CA253185NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG067744NIA NIH HHS U01 AG029824NIA NIH HHS U19 AG062682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although aspirin has been considered a promising agent for prevention of colorectal cancer, recent data suggest a lack of benefit among older individuals. Whether some individuals with higher risk of colorectal cancer may benefit from aspirin remains unknown. We used a 95-variant colorectal cancer polygenic risk score (PRS) to explore the association between genetic susceptibility to colorectal cancer and aspirin use in a prospective study of 12,609 individuals of European descent ages ≥70 years, enrolled in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial (randomized controlled trial; RCT). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of aspirin use on colorectal cancer, as well as the interaction between the PRS and aspirin treatment on colorectal cancer. Over a median of 4.7 years follow-up, 143 participants were diagnosed with incident colorectal cancer. Aspirin assignment was not associated with incidence of colorectal cancer overall [HR = 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68-1.30] or within strata of PRS (P for interaction = 0.97). However, the PRS was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (HR = 1.28 per SD; 95% CI, 1.09-1.51). Individuals in the top quintile of the PRS distribution had an 85% higher risk compared with individuals in the bottom quintile (HR = 1.85; 95% CI, 1.08-3.15). In a prospective RCT of older individuals, a PRS is associated with incident colorectal cancer risk, but aspirin use was not associated with a reduction of incident colorectal cancer, regardless of baseline genetic risk. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: There is strong evidence to support prophylactic aspirin use for the prevention of colorectal cancer. However recent recommendations suggest the risk of bleeding in older individuals outweighs the benefit. We sought to determine whether some older individuals might still benefit from aspirin based on their genetic susceptibility.

Indexed as

AspirinColorectal NeoplasmsAgedGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAspirin

Identifiers

PMID35348611
PMCPMC9256779
OpenAlexW4220879222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.