Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35348371›Full record

SynthesisDento maxillo facial radiology2022

Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental materials: a systematic review.

Lauren Bohner, Marcel Hanisch, Newton Sesma, Moritz Blanck-Lubarsch, Johannes Kleinheinz

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren BohnerDepartment of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3637-3928
Marcel HanischDepartment of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Newton SesmaDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Moritz Blanck-LubarschDepartment of Orthodontics, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Johannes KleinheinzDepartment of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DEUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this systematic review was to search in literature in which severity unintended effects are caused by dental materials in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), such as to evaluate whether these artifacts hamper the diagnosis in the head and neck region. MATERIALS AND

methodsClinical studies showing the severity of artifacts which dental materials are capable of causing in MRI of head and neck, such as their influence on diagnostic accuracy, were included in this review. The searches were conducted in four electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science), and a manual search was made in the reference lists of papers screened for full-text reading. Risk of bias was assessed using "Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2" (QUADAS-2). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the quality of evidence.

resultsFrom 151 studies selected for full-reading, 19 were considered eligible for this review. Artifacts caused by orthodontic appliances were well-documented, and stainless steel brackets were the materials most likely to cause artifacts in MR imaging of head and neck. The literature was scarce for dental implants and restorations. Diagnoses within the oral cavity, but also those of the brain and craniofacial structures, were affected.

conclusionArtifacts caused by orthodontic appliances may affect the diagnosis in oral cavity and craniofacial structures. Data regarding dental implants and prosthodontics restorations were inconclusive. The severity of artifacts in MRI and their influence on diagnosis is dependent on dental material features, location in the oral cavity, and magnetic resonance parameters.

Indexed as

ArtifactsDental ImplantsDental MaterialsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMouthOrthodontic AppliancesDental ImplantsDental MaterialsArtifactsDental ImplantsMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID35348371
PMCPMC10043623
OpenAlexW4221005971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.