Comparison of a Kidney Replacement Therapy Risk Score Developed in Kaiser Permanente Northwest vs Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease Using Decision Curve Analysis.

introductionUse of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) prediction models for guiding arteriovenous fistula (AVF) referrals in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown. We aimed to compare a hypothetical approach using a KRT prediction model developed in Kaiser Permanente Northwest to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for AVF referrals.

methodsOur retrospective cohort consisted of patients with stage G4 CKD in Kaiser Permanente Northwest followed by nephrology. Two-year KRT risk was calculated at each nephrology visit up to 2 years from entrance into cohort based on a previously published model. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) based on several 2-year KRT risk and eGFR cutoffs for outcome of hemodialysis at 18 months. We compared an approach of AVF referral using 2-year KRT risk and eGFR cutoffs using decision curve analysis.

resultsTwo-year KRT risk better discriminated progression to hemodialysis compared to eGFR < 15 mL/min (AUC 0.60 vs 0.69 at 2-year KRT risk > 20% and 0.69 at 2-year KRT risk > 40%, p = 0.003 and 0.006, respectively) but not to eGFR of 20 mL/min (AUC 0.64, p = 0.16 and 0.19, respectively). Decision curve analysis showed that AVF referral guided by 2-year KRT risk score resulted in higher net benefit compared to eGFR at low thresholds for referral.

conclusionIn stage G4 CKD, a 2-year KRT risk model better predicted progression to KRT at 18 months compared to an eGFR of 15 mL/min but not to 20 mL/min and may improve timely referral for AVF placement in patients at lower thresholds for referral.