Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35348097›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2021

Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction With Care and Surgical Outcomes for Total Hip and Knee Replacement.

Margaret C Wang, Priscilla H Chan, Elizabeth W Paxton, Jim Bellows, Kate Koplan, Violeta Rabrenovich, Jeff Convissar, Nithin C Reddy, Christopher D Grimsrud, Ronald A Navarro

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07439315 (The Effect of a Novel Joint Distraction Knee Orthosis for Treating Medial Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07439315 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of a Novel Joint Distraction Knee Orthosis for Treating Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorIcarus Medical InnovationsRan2026 to 2026Enrolled150ConditionsMedial Compartment Knee OsteoarthritisArmsMedial joint distraction brace
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Margaret C WangCare Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA.
Priscilla H ChanSurgical Outcomes and Analysis Department, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, CA.
Elizabeth W PaxtonSurgical Outcomes and Analysis Department, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, CA.
Jim BellowsCare Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA.
Kate KoplanThe Southeast Permanente Medical Group, Atlanta, GA.
Violeta RabrenovichThe Permanente Federation, Oakland, CA.
Jeff ConvissarThe Permanente Federation, Oakland, CA.
Nithin C ReddySouthern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, CA.
Christopher D GrimsrudThe Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA.
Ronald A NavarroSouthern California Permanente Medical Group, Harbor City, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough patient satisfaction with total joint arthroplasty has been a well-measured outcome, little is known about how preadmission and post-discharge care experiences affect patients' rating of satisfaction.

objectiveThis work aimed to identify actionable factors associated with better ratings of overall care and surgical results.

methodsA 36-item survey assessing care in the preoperative, perioperative, and post-discharge phases of care and across all phases was mailed to 7,031 patients who underwent primary unilateral elective total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in 2018. Exploratory factor analysis identified 7 actionable domains. Stepwise logistic regression models identified domains associated with ratings of overall care and satisfaction with surgical outcome.

resultsOf the 3,026 (43%) patients who returned the survey; 2,814 (93%) rated their overall experience of care as very good or excellent and satisfaction with surgical results as ≥ 7 on a 10-point scale. In exploratory factor analysis, four factors predicted higher ratings of both overall care and surgical outcome: knowing what to do with symptoms and pain during recovery (factor 1), self-reported health (factor 3), knowing what to expect before surgery (factor 4), and shared decision making (factor 6). Coordinated information among providers (factor 2), home health experience (factor 5), and patient-provider relationships (factor 7) also predicted overall care ratings.

conclusionPatient-centered quality improvement in total joint replacement care requires thinking of care across the entire episode, including before and after the hospital stay for surgery, in addition to perioperative care. The actionable factors identified from this study can be incorporated into total joint replacement care to improve patients' satisfaction with overall care and surgical results.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeAftercareHumansPatient DischargePatient SatisfactionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35348097
PMCPMC8784075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.