ArticleThe Permanente journal2021
System-Level Variation in Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapy Utilization: Findings From the Multiple Sclerosis Continuous Quality Improvement Research Collaborative.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Humanistic Approach to Improvement: The Multiple Sclerosis Continuous Quality Improvement Collaborative Coaching Approach.The Permanente journal · 2025Trial
- Diversity in Combating Complex, Chronic, and Costly Conditions Using a Learning Health System Approach: A Scoping Review.The Permanente journal · 2024Article
- Predictors of high- versus low-intensity first-line multiple sclerosis treatments.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Multiple Sclerosis Continuous Quality Improvement (MS-CQI) Collaborative is the first multicenter improvement research collaborative for multiple sclerosis (MS). The main objective of this study is to describe baseline system-level variation in disease-modifying therapy (DMT) utilization across 4 MS centers participating in MS-CQI.
methodsElectronic health record data from the first year of the 3-year MS-CQI study were analyzed. Participants were adults ≥ 18 years with MS presenting to any of the 4 MS-CQI centers. DMT utilization was categorized into oral, infusion, and injection types. Multinomial logistic regression was used to investigate associations between centers and DMT utilization.
resultsOverall, 2,029 patients were included in the analysis. Of those patients, 75.1% were female, mean age was 50 years, and 87.4% had relapsing-remitting MS. Overall, 32.7% were on an oral DMT, 23.5% on an infusion DMT, and 43.9% on an injection DMT. Overall, statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) were observed across centers for proportions of patients who received oral, infusion, and no DMTs. There were also overall significant differences (p < 0.01) across MS types for proportions of encounters who received oral, infusion, injection, no DMTs, and mean age varied significantly across centers.
conclusionSystem-level effects on MS treatment and outcomes have not been previously studied and our findings contribute initial evidence concerning system-level variation in DMT utilization. Results suggest system-level variation in DMT utilization (ie, after adjusting for individual level factors, MS center or location of care a person with MS engages in care influences DMT treatment choices), resulting in a lack of standardization in DMT management. Continued research and improvement efforts targeting system-level performance could improve outcomes for people with MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.