Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35348015›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology2022

Early-life fecal microbiome and metabolome dynamics in response to an intervention with infant formula containing specific prebiotics and postbiotics.

Alfonso Rodriguez-Herrera, Sebastian Tims, Jan Polman, Rocío Porcel Rubio, Antonio Muñoz Hoyos, Massimo Agosti, Gianluca Lista, Luigi T Corvaglia, Jan Knol, Guus Roeselers and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Alfonso Rodriguez-HerreraInstituto Hispalense de Pediatria, Sevilla, Spain.
Sebastian TimsDanone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7519-1575
Jan PolmanDanone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rocío Porcel RubioServicio de Pediatría, Hospital Quiron, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio Muñoz HoyosDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain.
Massimo AgostiNeonatologia e Terapia Intensiva Neonatale, Polo Universitario F. Del Ponte, Varese, Italy.
Gianluca ListaTerapia Intensiva Neonatale, Ospedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi, ASST-FBF-Sacco, Milano, Italy.
Luigi T CorvagliaIntensive Therapy Unit, Hospital S. Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Jan KnolDanone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Guus RoeselersDanone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4725-6105
Juan L Pérez NaveroPediatrics Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research, CIBERER, Cordoba, Spain.
Danone (Netherlands) · NLCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ESHospital Quirónsalud Barcelona · ESInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ESInstituto Hispalense de Pediatria · ESIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITOspedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi · ITOspedale Filippo Del Ponte Varese · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined fecal metabolome dynamics to gain greater functional insights into the interactions between nutrition and the activity of the developing gut microbiota in healthy term-born infants. The fecal samples used here originate from a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical study that assessed the efficacy of infant formula with prebiotics and postbiotics (experimental arm) compared with a standard infant formula (control arm). A group of exclusively breast-fed term infants was used as a reference arm. First, conventional targeted physiological and microbial measurements were performed, which showed differences in fecal

Indexed as

Infant FormulaMicrobiotaChromatography, LiquidFecesFemaleHumansInfantMetabolomePrebioticsRNA, Ribosomal, 16STandem Mass SpectrometryPrebioticsRNA, Ribosomal, 16Searly lifegut microbiotainfant formulametabolomics

Identifiers

PMID35348015
PMCPMC9109790
OpenAlexW4221051898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.