Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347638›Full record

ArticleAmbio2022

Ranking ecosystem services delivered by trees in urban and rural areas.

Patrycja Przewoźna, Krzysztof Mączka, Marcin Mielewczyk, Adam Inglot, Piotr Matczak

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrycja PrzewoźnaFaculty of Geographical and Geological Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University, Bogumiła Krygowskiego 10, 61-680, Poznań, Poland. pwysocka@amu.edu.pl.
Krzysztof MączkaFaculty of Sociology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89c, 60-568, Poznań, Poland.
Marcin MielewczykInstitute of Anthropology and Ethnology, Faculty of Anthropology and Cultural Science, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89, 60-568, Poznań, Poland.
Adam InglotFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, ul. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233, Gdansk, Poland.
Piotr MatczakFaculty of Sociology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89c, 60-568, Poznań, Poland.

Funding

Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej scholarship START edition 2020Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2017/25/B/HS6/00954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policies and strategies for tree management and protection on a national, regional, and local level have not sufficiently considered differences between rural and urban areas. We used expert knowledge to compare rural and urban areas in a case study evaluating the relative importance of ecosystem services (ES) in policy development. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and focus group discussions were used to rank 17 ES, representing four classes of services: provisioning, regulating, habitat, and cultural. The results indicated that effective protection strategies, beyond simply increasing general tree cover, should consider specific benefits trees provide to local communities. We discuss the role of objective prioritization of ES delivered by trees in urban and rural areas and their consequences for decision-making processes.

Indexed as

EcosystemTreesConservation of Natural ResourcesAnalytic hierarchy processEcosystem servicesEnvironmental managementExpert knowledgeTree protection

Identifiers

PMID35347638
PMCPMC9287513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.