Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347583›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2022

Radiomics textural features by MR imaging to assess clinical outcomes following liver resection in colorectal liver metastases.

Vincenza Granata, Roberta Fusco, Federica De Muzio, Carmen Cutolo, Sergio Venanzio Setola, Roberta Grassi, Francesca Grassi, Alessandro Ottaiano, Guglielmo Nasti, Fabiana Tatangelo and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Colorectal cancer liver metastases: A radiologic point of view.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Vincenza GranataDivision of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy. r.fusco@igeamedical.com.
Roberta FuscoMedical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, Napoli, Italy.
Federica De MuzioDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Carmen CutoloDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Sergio Venanzio SetolaDivision of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Roberta GrassiDivision of Radiology, Università Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Francesca GrassiDivision of Radiology, Università Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Alessandro OttaianoDivision of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Guglielmo NastiDivision of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Fabiana TatangeloDivision of Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo PiloneDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Vittorio MieleDivision of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Maria Chiara BruneseDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Francesco IzzoDivision of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Antonella PetrilloDivision of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITUniversity of Molise · ITUniversity of Salerno · ITIGEA Clinical Biophysics (Italy) · ITSocietà Italiana di Reumatologia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the efficacy of radiomics features obtained by T2-weighted sequences to predict clinical outcomes following liver resection in colorectal liver metastases patients.

methodsThis retrospective analysis was approved by the local Ethical Committee board and radiological databases were interrogated, from January 2018 to May 2021, to select patients with liver metastases with pathological proof and MRI study in pre-surgical setting. The cohort of patients included a training set and an external validation set. The internal training set included 51 patients with 61 years of median age and 121 liver metastases. The validation cohort consisted a total of 30 patients with single lesion with 60 years of median age. For each volume of interest, 851 radiomics features were extracted as median values using PyRadiomics. Nonparametric test, intraclass correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, linear regression modelling and pattern recognition methods (support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbours (KNN), artificial neural network (NNET) and decision tree (DT)) were considered.

resultsThe best predictor to discriminate expansive versus infiltrative front of tumour growth was obtained by wavelet_LHL_gldm_DependenceNonUniformityNormalized with an accuracy of 82%; to discriminate high grade versus low grade or absent was the wavelet_LLH_glcm_Imc1 with accuracy of 88%; to differentiate the mucinous type of tumour was the wavelet_LLH_glcm_JointEntropy with accuracy of 92% while to identify tumour recurrence was the wavelet_LLL_glcm_Correlation with accuracy of 85%. Linear regression model increased the performance obtained with respect to the univariate analysis exclusively in the discrimination of expansive versus infiltrative front of tumour growth reaching an accuracy of 90%, a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 80%. Considering significant texture metrics tested with pattern recognition approaches, the best performance was reached by the KNN in the discrimination of the tumour budding considering the four textural predictors obtaining an accuracy of 93%, a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 97%.

conclusionsOurs results confirmed the capacity of radiomics to identify as biomarkers, several prognostic features that could affect the treatment choice in patients with liver metastases, in order to obtain a more personalized approach.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsAged, 80 and overHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesLiver metastasisMagnetic resonance imagingOutcome predictionPattern recognitionRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID35347583
OpenAlexW4220764303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.