Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347582›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2022

Provision of follow-up care for women with a history of breast cancer following the 2016 position paper by the Italian Group for Mammographic Screening and the Italian College of Breast Radiologists by SIRM: a survey of Senonetwork Italian breast centres.

Silvia Deandrea, Francesco Sardanelli, Massimo Calabrese, Francesca Ferré, Milena Vainieri, Elisabetta Sestini, Francesca Caumo, Gianni Saguatti, Lauro Bucchi, Luigi Cataliotti

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Gender Medicine in Clinical Radiology Practice.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia DeandreaEnvironmental Health Unit, Agency for Health Protection, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1509-951X
Francesco SardanelliUnit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-9427
Massimo CalabreseUOC Radiologia Senologica, IRCCS-Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7281-5573
Francesca FerréManagement and Health Laboratory, Department EMbeDS, Institute of Management, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-517X
Milena VainieriManagement and Health Laboratory, Department EMbeDS, Institute of Management, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-4487
Elisabetta SestiniEuropa Donna Italia, Milano, Italy.
Francesca CaumoDepartment of Breast Radiology, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9457-5176
Gianni SaguattiSenology Unit, Local Health Authority, Bologna, Italy.
Lauro BucchiRomagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy. lauro.bucchi@irst.emr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6771-8119
Luigi CataliottiA.P.S. Senonetwork Italia, Florence, Italy.
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITAgenzia Regionale per la Protezione Ambientale del Piemonte · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna · ITEuropa Donna · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2016, the Italian Group for Mammography Screening and the Italian College of Breast Radiologists by the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology recommended that screening programmes and specialist breast centres actively invite women with a history of breast cancer to follow-up imaging.

objectiveA survey of breast centres associated with Senonetwork, the Italian network of breast cancer services, has offered the opportunity to assess the implementation of this recommendation.

methodsA national, cross-sectional, voluntary, online survey was developed, pre-tested, and administered during the months July-October 2020. Five of the 73 questionnaire items concerned breast cancer follow-up.

resultsThe response rate was 82/128 (65%). Of the 82 respondent centres, 69 (84%) were involved in a screening programme. Fifty-six (68%) reported the presence of a programme of active invitation to breast cancer follow-up targeted at patients living in their catchment area, with a significant north-to-south gradient. Four centres (5%) reported that the screening programme was responsible for actively initiating follow-up during the 10-year period since diagnosis. Only after 10 years did the proportion increase moderately.

conclusionScreening programmes have still a marginal role in active breast cancer follow-up.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAftercareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMammographyMass ScreeningRadiologistsBreast cancerBreast centreFollow-upMammographyScreeningSurveySurvivorship care

Identifiers

PMID35347582
PMCPMC8960092
OpenAlexW4220906065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.