Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347566›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2022

Current State and Future Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence for Automated Coronary Angiography Imaging Analysis in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease.

Mitchel A Molenaar, Jasper L Selder, Johny Nicolas, Bimmer E Claessen, Roxana Mehran, Javier Oliván Bescós, Mark J Schuuring, Berto J Bouma, Niels J Verouden, Steven A J Chamuleau

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Artery Interventions: Preprocedural Planning and Procedural Assistance.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Editorial: Digital Solutions in Cardiology.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mitchel A MolenaarAmsterdam University Medical Centers-Location VU Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.a.molenaar1@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-0703-9111
Jasper L SelderAmsterdam University Medical Centers-Location VU Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johny NicolasThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029-6574, USA.
Bimmer E ClaessenAmsterdam University Medical Centers-Location VU Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Roxana MehranThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029-6574, USA.
Javier Oliván BescósDepartment of Interventional X-Ray, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands.
Mark J SchuuringAmsterdam University Medical Centers-Location Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2843-1852
Berto J BoumaAmsterdam University Medical Centers-Location Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niels J VeroudenAmsterdam University Medical Centers-Location VU Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Steven A J ChamuleauAmsterdam University Medical Centers-Location VU Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USPhilips (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewArtificial intelligence (AI) applications in (interventional) cardiology continue to emerge. This review summarizes the current state and future perspectives of AI for automated imaging analysis in invasive coronary angiography (ICA). RECENT

findingsRecently, 12 studies on AI for automated imaging analysis In ICA have been published. In these studies, machine learning (ML) models have been developed for frame selection, segmentation, lesion assessment, and functional assessment of coronary flow. These ML models have been developed on monocenter datasets (in range 31-14,509 patients) and showed moderate to good performance. However, only three ML models were externally validated. Given the current pace of AI developments for the analysis of ICA, less-invasive, objective, and automated diagnosis of CAD can be expected in the near future. Further research on this technology in the catheterization laboratory may assist and improve treatment allocation, risk stratification, and cath lab logistics by integrating ICA analysis with other clinical characteristics.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisMyocardial IschemiaArtificial IntelligenceCoronary AngiographyHumansArtificial intelligenceCoronary angiographyCoronary stenosisDeep learningImage processing

Identifiers

PMID35347566
PMCPMC8979928
OpenAlexW4221057062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.