ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2022
Biologics for immunoglobulin A vasculitis: targeting vasculitis or comorbid disease?
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult-onset IgA vasculitis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Guideline
- Rituximab as possible therapy in TNF inhibitor-induced IgA vasculitis with severe renal involvement.BMC nephrology · 2023Article
- Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in immunoglobulin A vasculitis with gastrointestinal tract involvement.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical features and treatments, including the use of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in a large cohort of pediatric and adult immunoglobulin A vasculitis (IgAV). Since data on the use of bDMARDs in IgAV are very limited, we collated the reasons for use of bDMARDs during the disease course. Patients who were enrolled in the Hacettepe University Vasculitis Research Centre (HUVAC) registry were included. In this prospective database dating from 2014, there were 436 IgAV patients classified as IgAV according to Ankara 2008 and/or American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria. 88 adults and 330 pediatric IgAV patients were included as the main study group. Concomitant spondyloarthritis (SpA) was observed only in adult patients (10% vs 0% in children, p < 0.001). IgAV relapse was more common in adults than in children (p: 0.017). Adult patients were mostly treated with corticosteroid (p < 0.001) and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment (< 0.001), while more than half of the pediatric patients were followed up without immunosuppressive treatment. Ten (11%) adult patients used biologics. Among them, two patients used rituximab due to IgAV disease activity, three used infliximab due to SpA, three used etanercept due to SpA (one patient had a pediatric onset enthesitis-related arthritis), and two used anakinra due to recurrent familial Mediterranean fever attacks. This is the first study evaluating the use of all bDMARDs for any reason in the IgAV cohorts in the literature. None of the pediatric patients used biologics. Our data suggest biologics are mainly used for comorbid inflammatory diseases over refractory vasculitis in adult IgAV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.