ArticleClinical rheumatology2022
Autoantibody cluster analysis in juvenile lupus nephritis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autoantibody repertoire in lupus nephritis: from pathogenic mechanisms to clinical integration for precision decision-making.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- Identifying distinct phenotypes of patients with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a cluster analysis by the Egyptian college of rheumatology (ECR) study group.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Autoantibody-based subgroups and longitudinal seroconversion in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.Lupus science & medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDemographics, clinical features, and biomarkers do not consistently anticipate risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in juvenile lupus nephritis (LN). Here, the existence of autoantibody clusters predictive of ESRD was explored in a cohort of biopsy-proven juvenile LN.
methodsA retrospective chart review was performed of patients with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE) and biopsy-confirmed LN. Primary endpoints were ESRD and mortality. Patients were included for K-medians cluster analysis if they had a complete autoantibody profile, which included ANA titer, anti-dsDNA, anti-Smith, anti-RNP, anti-Ro/SSA, anti-La/SSB. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables and one-way ANOVA for continuous measures. Significance was p<0.05.
resultsFifty-three met inclusion criteria, of which 45 were female and 37 were black. Over 80% developed LN within one year of jSLE onset and more than half (n=29) had LN at diagnosis of jSLE. Six developed ESRD. No mortalities were reported. Forty-six had a complete autoantibody profile, including four with ESRD. Three clusters were identified. Group 1 (n=8) was defined by anti-dsDNA; group 2 (n=28) by high-titer ANA (>1:1280), anti-Smith, anti-RNP, and anti-Ro/SSA; and group 3 (n=10) by anti-dsDNA and anti-Ro/SSA. There was no difference between the groups in demographics, jSLE manifestations, or markers of renal function. One in group 2 and three in group 3 developed ESRD. Those in group 3 were younger at diagnosis of LN (p=0.084) and had the highest frequency of ESRD (p=0.025).
conclusionCluster analysis revealed the highest frequency of ESRD in the group with LN defined by anti-Ro/SSA and anti-dsDNA co-positivity. Key Points • Lupus nephritis commonly is present at diagnosis of juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus or develops within the first year. • End-stage renal disease was more frequent in the cluster defined by anti-dsDNA and anti-Ro/SSA co-positivity; patients with this profile may benefit from more aggressive immunosuppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.