Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347483›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2022

Impact of cyclic changes in pharmacokinetics and absorbed dose in pediatric neuroblastoma patients receiving [

Javian C Malcolm, Nadia Falzone, Jennifer E Gains, Matthew D Aldridge, David Mirando, Boon Q Lee, Mark N Gaze, Katherine A Vallis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fraction-dependent dose dynamics and clinical safety in high-risk neuroblastoma treated with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Trial
  2. Safety and dosimetry of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Trial
  3. [JMIR research protocols · 2026
    Article
  4. Dosimetry-Driven Personalization of Radiopharmaceutical Therapies: Evidence and Opportunities.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Cumulative Absorbed Dose and Successive Cyclic Reduction in Absorbed Dose Predict Response toJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Effect of previousAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Expanding the therapeutic horizon ofNagoya journal of medical science · 2025
    Review
  8. CanJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Characterization of Effective Half-Life for Instant Single-Time-Point Dosimetry Using Machine Learning.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Theranostics for Neuroblastoma: Making Molecular Radiotherapy Work Better.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Role ofFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Prediction of [EJNMMI physics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Javian C MalcolmOxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Nadia FalzoneOxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Jennifer E GainsDepartment of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Matthew D AldridgeInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
David MirandoMIM Software, Beachwood, OH, USA.
Boon Q LeeOxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Mark N GazeDepartment of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Katherine A VallisOxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK. katherine.vallis@oncology.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4672-5683
University of Oxford · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBRHAMM Technologies (United States) · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14091Cancer Research UK 22906Cancer Research UK 28736Cancer Research UK 28990Cancer Research UK C5255/A15935Cancer Research UK C7893/ A28990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecent reports personalizing the administered activity (AA) of each cycle of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy based on the predicted absorbed dose (AD) to the kidneys (dose-limiting organ) have been promising. Assuming identical renal pharmacokinetics for each cycle is pragmatic, however it may lead to over- or under-estimation of the optimal AA. Here, we investigate the influence that earlier cycles of [

methodsA simulation study, based on dosimetry data from six children with NBL who received four-cycles of [

resultsThe median tumour AD per cycle was found to decrease from 15.6 Gy (range 8.12-26.4) in cycle 1 to 11.4 Gy (range 9.67-28.8), 11.3 Gy (range 2.73-32.9) and 4.3 Gy (range 0.72-20.1) in cycles 2, 3 and 4, respectively. By the fourth cycle, the median of the ratios of the delivered AD (AD

conclusionThis study demonstrates variability in Gy/GBq and tumour AD per cycle in children receiving four administrations of [

Indexed as

[177Lu]Lu-DOTATATEDosimetryInter-cyclic changesNeuroblastomaPeptide receptor radionuclide therapyPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID35347483
PMCPMC8960523
OpenAlexW4220997689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.