Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347425›Full record

ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Artificial intelligence in spine care: current applications and future utility.

Alexander L Hornung, Christopher M Hornung, G Michael Mallow, J Nicolás Barajas, Augustus Rush, Arash J Sayari, Fabio Galbusera, Hans-Joachim Wilke, Matthew Colman, Frank M Phillips and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in ASD treatment.North American Spine Society journal · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexander L HornungDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christopher M HornungUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
G Michael MallowDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Nicolás BarajasDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Augustus RushDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Arash J SayariDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Fabio GalbuseraSpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Hans-Joachim WilkeInstitute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Trauma Research Center Ulm, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Matthew ColmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Frank M PhillipsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Howard S AnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Dino SamartzisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. Dino_Samartzis@rush.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7473-1311
Rush University Medical Center · USSchulthess-Klinik · CHUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe field of artificial intelligence is ever growing and the applications of machine learning in spine care are continuously advancing. Given the advent of the intelligence-based spine care model, understanding the evolution of computation as it applies to diagnosis, treatment, and adverse event prediction is of great importance. Therefore, the current review sought to synthesize findings from the literature at the interface of artificial intelligence and spine research.

methodsA narrative review was performed based on the literature of three databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus) from January 2015 to March 2021 that examined historical and recent advancements in the understanding of artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine research. Studies were appraised for their role in, or description of, advancements within image recognition and predictive modeling for spinal research. Only English articles that fulfilled inclusion criteria were ultimately incorporated in this review.

resultsThis review briefly summarizes the history and applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine. Three basic machine learning training paradigms: supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforced learning are also discussed. Artificial intelligence and machine learning have been utilized in almost every facet of spine ranging from localization and segmentation techniques in spinal imaging to pathology specific algorithms which include but not limited to; preoperative risk assessment of postoperative complications, screening algorithms for patients at risk of osteoporosis and clustering analysis to identify subgroups within adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The future of artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine surgery is also discussed with focusing on novel algorithms, data collection techniques and increased utilization of automated systems.

conclusionImprovements to modern-day computing and accessibility to various imaging modalities allow for innovative discoveries that may arise, for example, from management. Given the imminent future of AI in spine surgery, it is of great importance that practitioners continue to inform themselves regarding AI, its goals, use, and progression. In the future, it will be critical for the spine specialist to be able to discern the utility of novel AI research, particularly as it continues to pervade facets of everyday spine surgery.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningAdolescentAlgorithmsHumansArtificial intelligenceClinical utilityMachine learningNeural networkResearchSpine

Identifiers

PMID35347425
OpenAlexW4220982628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.