Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347424›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Cement discoplasty for managing lumbar spine pseudarthrosis in elderly patients: a less invasive alternative approach for failed posterior lumbar spine interbody fusion.

Mahmoud Alkharsawi, Mootaz Shousha, Heinrich Boehm, Mohamed Alhashash

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cement discoplasty for degenerative low back pain: a delphi consensus survey of expert opinion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahmoud AlkharsawiDepartment of Spine Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Robert-Koch-Allee 7, 99437, Bad Berka, Germany. m.alkharsawi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5492-9419
Mootaz ShoushaDepartment of Spine Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Robert-Koch-Allee 7, 99437, Bad Berka, Germany.
Heinrich BoehmDepartment of Spine Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Robert-Koch-Allee 7, 99437, Bad Berka, Germany.
Mohamed AlhashashDepartment of Spine Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Robert-Koch-Allee 7, 99437, Bad Berka, Germany.
Zentralklinik Bad Berka · DETanta University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate pseudoarthrosis treatment results by injection of cement in disc space of failed fusion in posterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients above 65 years.

methodsForty-five patients above 65 years with symptomatic pseudarthrosis after lumbar spine fusion were treated by cement injection in the affected disc space.

resultsThere were 30 females and 15 males. The mean age at the operation was 74 ± 6.5 years (range 65-89). Discoplasty was performed after the primary fusion operations after a mean of 14 ± 1.3 months (range 12-24). The mean preoperative VAS was 7.5 (range 6-9), and ODI was 36 (range 30-45). Cement injection was done at one level in most of the cases (35 patients). In seven cases, two injection levels were done, and in three cases, three levels. Twenty-three patients had discoplasty only, while 22 had discoplasty and screws change, including 14 cases of extension of the instrumentation. The mean postoperative follow-up was 32 ± 6.5 months. The VAS improved to 3.5 (range 2-5) (p = 0.02) and ODI to 12.3 (range 5-35) (p = 0.001). Reoperation was indicated in two (4%) patients by screws loosening. Asymptomatic cement leakage occurred in the paravertebral space in seven cases (15.5%).

conclusionCement discoplasty offers a less invasive reliable surgical solution in elderly patients with symptomatic lumbar pseudarthrosis in the elderly patients. In cases with screw loosening, discoplasty should be combined with screw revision.

Indexed as

PseudarthrosisSpinal FusionAgedAged, 80 and overBone CementsFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBone CementsCement augmentationDiscoplastyElderlyPseudoarthrosisSpine fusion

Identifiers

PMID35347424
OpenAlexW4220890149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.