Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347420›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2022

Clinical efficacy of lip repositioning technique and its modifications for the treatment of gummy smile: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Andrea Mendoza-Geng, Kelly Gonzales-Medina, Jonathan Meza-Mauricio, Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes Muniz, Andrea Vergara-Buenaventura

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea Mendoza-GengDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Panamericana Sur Km 19, Villa, Lima, Peru.
Kelly Gonzales-MedinaDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Panamericana Sur Km 19, Villa, Lima, Peru.
Jonathan Meza-MauricioDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Panamericana Sur Km 19, Villa, Lima, Peru.
Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes MunizDepartment of Periodontology, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Andrea Vergara-BuenaventuraDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Panamericana Sur Km 19, Villa, Lima, Peru. avergarab@cientifica.edu.pe.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9395-1010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review the literature regarding the clinical efficacy of reducing excessive gingival display (EGD) using the surgical lip repositioning technique (LRT) and its modifications. The question to address was: "What is the clinical efficacy of the surgical LRT and its modifications in patients with EGD?" MATERIAL AND

methodsFour databases (MEDLINE-PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) were searched up to December 2021 (PROSPERO-CRD42020205987). Randomized, non-randomized controlled and prospective case series with a minimum of 6-month follow-up were eligible for inclusion. Two meta-analyses were performed using the mean difference (MD) between baseline and different follow-up periods (6 and 12 months). Subgroup analyses were performed using the different modifications of LRT.

resultsThe electronic research retrieved 783 studies. Only 13 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the statistical analysis. Six modifications of the original LRT were identified. An overall EGD reduction of -3.06 mm (95%CI: -3.71-2.40), -2.91 mm; (95%CI: -3.66-2.15) and -2.76 mm; (95%CI: -3.83--1.70) was achieved after 6, 12, and 36 months, respectively, compared to baseline (P < 0.01). Meta-analysis revealed that the use of LRT with periosteal suturing showed the greatest decrease in EGD with 5.22 mm (95% CI: 4.23-6.21; P < 0.01) at 6 months and 4.94 mm (95% CI: 3.86-6.02; P < 0.01) at 12 months.

conclusionsBoth the original LRT and its different modifications reduce EGD and provide good results and overall patient satisfaction at 6, 12, and 36 months of follow-up. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Evaluating the different modifications of the LRT can be a guiding aspect for the clinical and surgical approach to be used in patients with EGD.

Indexed as

GingivectomySmilingEsthetics, DentalGingivaHumansLipTreatment OutcomeExcessive gingival displayGummy smileLip repositioning techniqueSmile

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.