Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347410›Full record

ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2022

[New assessment recommendations for disability in private accident insurance, part 1 : An interdisciplinary consented approach-Basics].

H-T Klemm, E Ludolph, W Willauschus, M Wich

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H-T KlemmFachgesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Begutachtung e. V., Bayreuth, Deutschland. dr.klemm@fimb.de.
E LudolphFachgesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Begutachtung e. V., Bayreuth, Deutschland.
W WillauschusFachgesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Begutachtung e. V., Bayreuth, Deutschland.
M WichFachgesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Begutachtung e. V., Bayreuth, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The centerpiece of a private accident insurer is the benefit promise in cases of disability, which must be determined by a doctor in due time. The insurer specifies the rates of the compensation scheme for loss or inability to function and the medical expert must then fall back on generally recognized, revised or updated assessment recommendations in order to be able to apply the given framework to the specific, individual situation of the insured person. In four steps (basics, upper and lower extremities [disability within the compensation scheme] and disability outside the compensation scheme) interdisciplinary consensus benchmarks for disability assessment are presented, which should form the basis of a uniform medical assessment of accident-related functional disorders in private accident insurance compensation.

Indexed as

Expert TestimonyInsurance, AccidentAccidentsDisability EvaluationHumansAccident insuranceConsensus benchmarksDisability assessmentImpairment of physical performanceInsurance compensation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.