Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347353›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2022

Statistical analysis of isocratic chromatographic data using Bayesian modeling.

Agnieszka Kamedulska, Łukasz Kubik, Paweł Wiczling

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Agnieszka KamedulskaDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacodynamics, Medical University of Gdańsk, al. Gen. J. Hallera 107, Gdańsk, 80-416, Poland.
Łukasz KubikDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacodynamics, Medical University of Gdańsk, al. Gen. J. Hallera 107, Gdańsk, 80-416, Poland.
Paweł WiczlingDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacodynamics, Medical University of Gdańsk, al. Gen. J. Hallera 107, Gdańsk, 80-416, Poland. wiczling@gumed.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatographic retention times are usually modeled considering only one analyte at a time. However, it has certain limitations as no information is shared between the analytes, and consequently the model predictions poorly generalize to out-of-sample analytes. In this work, a publicly available dataset was used to illustrate the benefits of pooling the individual data and analyzing them simultaneously utilizing Bayesian hierarchical approach. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Stan program coupled with R, which enables full Bayesian inference with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. This methodology allows (i) incorporating prior knowledge about the likely values of model parameters, (ii) considering the between-analyte variability and the correlation between the model parameters, (iii) explaining the between-analyte variability by available predictors, and (iv) sharing information across the analytes. The latter is especially valuable when only limited information is available in the data about certain model parameters. The results are obtained in the form of posterior probability distribution, which quantifies uncertainty about the model parameters and predictions. Posterior probability is also directly relevant for decision-making. In this work, we used the Neue model to describe the relationship between retention factor and acetonitrile content in the mobile phase for 1026 analytes. The model was parametrized in terms of retention factor in 100% water, retention factor in 100% acetonitrile, and curvature coefficient, and considered log P and pK

Indexed as

WaterBayes TheoremChromatography, High Pressure LiquidWaterBayesian inferenceMethod developmentMultilevel modelRetention modeling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.