ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2022
Statistical analysis of isocratic chromatographic data using Bayesian modeling.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative Structure Retention-Relationship Modeling: Towards an Innovative General-Purpose Strategy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromatographic retention times are usually modeled considering only one analyte at a time. However, it has certain limitations as no information is shared between the analytes, and consequently the model predictions poorly generalize to out-of-sample analytes. In this work, a publicly available dataset was used to illustrate the benefits of pooling the individual data and analyzing them simultaneously utilizing Bayesian hierarchical approach. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Stan program coupled with R, which enables full Bayesian inference with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. This methodology allows (i) incorporating prior knowledge about the likely values of model parameters, (ii) considering the between-analyte variability and the correlation between the model parameters, (iii) explaining the between-analyte variability by available predictors, and (iv) sharing information across the analytes. The latter is especially valuable when only limited information is available in the data about certain model parameters. The results are obtained in the form of posterior probability distribution, which quantifies uncertainty about the model parameters and predictions. Posterior probability is also directly relevant for decision-making. In this work, we used the Neue model to describe the relationship between retention factor and acetonitrile content in the mobile phase for 1026 analytes. The model was parametrized in terms of retention factor in 100% water, retention factor in 100% acetonitrile, and curvature coefficient, and considered log P and pK
Indexed as
Identifiers
35347353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.