Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347348›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2022

COVID-19 lockdown impact on familial relationships and mental health in a large representative sample of Italian adults.

Margherita Zeduri, Giacomo Pietro Vigezzi, Greta Carioli, Alessandra Lugo, Chiara Stival, Andrea Amerio, Giuseppe Gorini, Roberta Pacifici, Pierluigi Politi, Silvano Gallus and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Margherita ZeduriDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, via Forlanini, 2, Pavia, Italy.
Giacomo Pietro VigezziSchool of Medicine, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Greta CarioliDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra LugoDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Chiara StivalDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Andrea AmerioDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Giuseppe GoriniOncologic Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1413-5948
Roberta PacificiNational Centre on Addiction and Doping, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Pierluigi PolitiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4602-2032
Silvano GallusDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Anna OdoneDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, via Forlanini, 2, Pavia, Italy. anna.odone@unipv.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5657-9774
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Milan · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

Fondazione Cariplo 2018-0863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBenefits of national-level stay-at-home order imposed in Italy to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission need to be carefully weighed against its impact on citizens' health. In a country with a strong familial culture and where welfare relies on households, confinement drastically decreased support provided by elder relatives, which may have resulted in mental health worsening.

methodsA web-based cross-sectional study (LOST in Italy) was conducted on a representative sample of Italian adults during lockdown (27th of April-3rd of May 2020). We asked 3156 subjects to report on reduced help in housework and childcare from retired parents to assess the impact of confinement on mental health, through validated scales before and during lockdown.

resultsOverall, 1484 (47.0%) subjects reported reduced housework help from parents, and 769 (64.0%, of the 1202 subjects with children) diminished babysitting support. Subjects reporting reduced housework help had worsened sleep quality (multivariate odds ratio, OR = 1.74, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.49-2.03) and quantity (OR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.28-1.76), depressive (OR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.14-1.53) and anxiety symptoms (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.32-1.78), compared to those reporting unreduced help. Worsening in sleep quality (OR = 2.32, 95% CI 1.76-3.05), and quantity (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.36-2.37), depressive (OR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.39-2.31) and anxiety symptoms (OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.48-2.46) was also associated with reduced babysitting help. Mental health outcomes were worse in subjects with poorer housing and teleworking during lockdown.

conclusionConfinement came along with reduced familial support from parents, negatively impacting household members' mental health. Our findings might inform evidence-based family and welfare policies to promote population health within and beyond pandemic times.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAgedAnxietyChildCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesHumansItalyMental HealthSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 home confinementCross-sectional studyFamilial relationsItalyMental healthSocial security system

Identifiers

PMID35347348
PMCPMC8960228
OpenAlexW4220875153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.