Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347259›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2022

Extinction, coextinction and colonization dynamics in plant-hummingbird networks under climate change.

Jesper Sonne, Pietro K Maruyama, Ana M Martín González, Carsten Rahbek, Jordi Bascompte, Bo Dalsgaard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pollination ecology in the tropical Andes: moving towards a cross-scale approach.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Urban environments increase generalization of hummingbird-plant networks across climate gradients.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. How artificial light at night may rewire ecological networks: concepts and models.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Jesper SonneCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. jesper.sonne@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-7288
Pietro K MaruyamaCentre for Ecological Synthesis and Conservation, Department of Genetics, Ecology and Evolution-ICB, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5492-2324
Ana M Martín GonzálezPacific Ecoinformatics and Computational Ecology Lab, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9429-7180
Carsten RahbekCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4585-0300
Jordi BascompteDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0108-6411
Bo DalsgaardCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2867-2805
University of Copenhagen · DKPacific Biosciences (United States) · USUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate-driven range shifts may cause local extinctions, while the accompanying loss of biotic interactions may trigger secondary coextinctions. At the same time, climate change may facilitate colonizations from regional source pools, balancing out local species loss. At present, how these extinction-coextinction-colonization dynamics affect biological communities under climate change is poorly understood. Using 84 communities of interacting plants and hummingbirds, we simulated patterns in climate-driven extinctions, coextinctions and colonizations under future climate change scenarios. Our simulations showed clear geographic discrepancies in the communities' vulnerability to climate change. Andean communities were the least affected by future climate change, as they experienced few climate-driven extinctions and coextinctions while having the highest colonization potential. In North America and lowland South America, communities had many climate-driven extinctions and few colonization events. Meanwhile, the pattern of coextinction was highly dependent on the configuration of networks formed by interacting hummingbirds and plants. Notably, North American communities experienced proportionally fewer coextinctions than other regions because climate-driven extinctions here primarily affected species with peripheral network roles. Moreover, coextinctions generally decreased in communities where species have few overlapping interactions, that is, communities with more complementary specialized and modular networks. Together, these results highlight that we should not expect colonizations to adequately balance out local extinctions in the most vulnerable ecoregions.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeExtinction, BiologicalAnimalsBirdsNorth AmericaPlants

Identifiers

PMID35347259
OpenAlexW4220657343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.