Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347257›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2022

Changes in precipitation patterns can destabilize plant species coexistence via changes in plant-soil feedback.

Jan-Hendrik Dudenhöffer, Noah C Luecke, Kerri M Crawford

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Water shifts the balance of coexistence.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jan-Hendrik DudenhöfferDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. jhdudenhoeffer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1548-1436
Noah C LueckeDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0820-975X
Kerri M CrawfordDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4421-2243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change can alter species coexistence through changes in biotic interactions. By describing reciprocal interactions between plants and soil microbes, plant-soil feedback (PSF) has emerged as a powerful framework for predicting plant species coexistence and community dynamics, but little is known about how PSF will respond to changing climate conditions. Hence, the context dependency of PSF has recently gained attention. Water availability is a major driver of all biotic interactions, and it is expected that precipitation patterns will change with ongoing climate change. We tested how soil water content affects PSF by conducting a full factorial pairwise PSF experiment using eight plant species common to southeastern United States coastal prairies under three watering treatments. We found coexistence-stabilizing negative PSF at drier-than-average conditions shifted to coexistence-destabilizing positive PSF under wetter-than-average conditions. A simulation model parameterized with the experimental results supports the prediction that more positive PSF accelerates the erosion of diversity within communities while decreasing the predictability in plant community composition. Our results underline the importance of considering environmental context dependency of PSF in light of a rapidly changing climate.

Indexed as

PlantsSoilClimate ChangeFeedbackWaterSoilWater

Identifiers

PMID35347257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.