Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347245›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2022

Exclusive breastfeeding promotion policies: whose oxygen mask are we prioritizing?

C Rueda, M A Bright, D Roussos-Ross, D Montoya-Williams

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Risk-Reducing Measures for Cancer Prevention.Korean journal of family medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C RuedaICON plc., 4130 Parklake Ave 400, Raleigh, NC, USA. ruedacarolina@prahs.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1740-500X
M A BrightDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
D Roussos-RossDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2283-2441
D Montoya-WilliamsChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Florida · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USPRA Health Sciences · US

Funding

Maternal Resilience to Stress, Neonatal Outcomes, and Racial/Ethnic Health DisparitiesK23HD102526 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI MONTOYA-WILLIAMS, DIANA C · 2021 to 2025
$793k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD102526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Provision of human milk is crucial for maternal and infant health. However, exclusive breastfeeding may exacerbate mood disorders in women unable to achieve this goal. A nuanced approach that considers all aspects of maternal and infant health is needed. In this paper, we bring attention to the potentially negative consequences on maternal and infant health that may be associated with exclusive breastfeeding in the setting of significant challenges. We discuss recent literature exploring the relationship between breastfeeding and maternal mental health, and contextualize it with our first-hand experiences as healthcare professionals who aimed to exclusively breastfeed and encountered difficulties. Given existing evidence and our collective anecdotal experience, we advocate for a balanced approach when supporting parents struggling to breastfeed. Timely recommendations are offered for healthcare providers, medical educators and hospital administrators seeking to balance maternal and infant child health considerations while continuing to promote breastfeeding. PRéCIS STATEMENT: Exclusively promotion of breastfeeding impacts maternal mental health and consequently, infant health. We advocate for balanced considerations of maternal and infant child health while promoting breastfeeding. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Singular promotion of exclusive breastfeeding may exacerbate adverse maternal mental health outcomes. A balanced consideration of maternal and infant child health is vital as breastfeeding is encouraged. Clinicians who provide front-line support to breastfeeding parents must be taught and expected to provide nuanced breastfeeding support that anticipates both physical and mental health challenges.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingPolicyChildFemaleHumansInfantMothersOxygenOxygen

Identifiers

PMID35347245
PMCPMC8960073
OpenAlexW4220767139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.