Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347214›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Spatial ecology, activity patterns, and habitat use by giant pythons (Simalia amethistina) in tropical Australia.

Daniel Natusch, Jessica Lyons, Richard Shine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel NatuschSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia. d.natusch@epicbiodiversity.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3275-518X
Jessica LyonsEPIC Biodiversity, Frogs Hollow, NSW, 2550, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7579-447X
Richard ShineSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7529-5657
Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research · AUMacquarie University · AURural Training Initiatives · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although giant snakes are abundant in some tropical forests, their ecology is far less well-known than for smaller species of snakes in cooler climates. Information on spatial ecology can clarify management issues such as the sizes and types of habitats needed for conservation. We radio-tracked 27 scrub pythons (Simalia amethistina; snout-vent lengths 2.02 to 3.70 m) in Cape York, near the northeastern tip of Australia, for a mean period of 426 days (up to 1001 days) per snake. Home ranges were larger in males than females (means 0.60 vs. 0.28 km

Indexed as

BoidaeAnimalsEcologyEcosystemFemaleHoming BehaviorHumansMaleSeasons

Identifiers

PMID35347214
PMCPMC8960824
OpenAlexW4221128474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.