Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347172›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Speed-accuracy tradeoffs influence the main sequence of saccadic eye movements.

Leslie Guadron, A John van Opstal, Jeroen Goossens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Influence of Time Pressure on Successive Visual Searches.Journal of eye movement research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Conserved features of eye movement related eardrum oscillations (EMREOs) across humans and monkeys.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leslie GuadronDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboudumc, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
A John van OpstalDepartment of Biophysics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9010//066, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jeroen GoossensDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboudumc, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. J.Goossens@donders.ru.nl.

Funding

European Research Council 693400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have proposed that an optimal speed-accuracy tradeoff underlies the stereotyped relationship between amplitude, duration and peak velocity of saccades (main sequence). To test this theory, we asked 8 participants to make saccades to Gaussian-blurred spots and manipulated the task's accuracy constraints by varying target size (1, 3, and 5°). The largest targets indeed yielded more endpoint scatter (and lower gains) than the smallest targets, although this effect subsided with target eccentricity. The main sequence depended on several interacting factors: saccade latency, saccade gain and target size. Early saccades, which were faster than amplitude-matched late saccades, followed the target-size dependency one would expect from a speed-accuracy tradeoff process. They had higher peak velocities and shorter durations for larger targets than for smaller targets. For late saccades, however, the opposite was found. Deviations from the main sequence also covaried with saccade gain, in line with the idea that motor noise underlies part of the endpoint variability. Thus, our data provide partial evidence that the saccadic system weighs the detrimental effects of motor noise on saccade accuracy against movement duration and speed, but other factors also modulate the kinematics. We discuss the possible involvement of parallel saccade pathways to account for our findings.

Indexed as

NoiseSaccadesBiomechanical PhenomenaData CollectionHumansTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID35347172
PMCPMC8960849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.