Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347160›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Evaluating the usefulness of VGI from Waze for the reporting of flash floods.

Chris Lowrie, Andrew Kruczkiewicz, Shanna N McClain, Miriam Nielsen, Simon J Mason

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chris LowrieInternational Research Institute for Climate and Society, Climate School, Columbia University, New York, USA. cjl2210@columbia.edu.
Andrew KruczkiewiczInternational Research Institute for Climate and Society, Climate School, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Shanna N McClainNational Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
Miriam NielsenDepartment of Earth and Environmental Science, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Simon J MasonInternational Research Institute for Climate and Society, Climate School, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Columbia University · USNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · USUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

NASA 80NSSC18K0342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using volunteered geographic information (VGI) to supplement disaster risk management systems, including forecasting, risk assessment, and disaster recovery, is increasingly popular. This attention is driven by difficulties in detection and characterization of hazards, as well as the rise of VGI appropriate for characterizing specific forms of risk. Flash-flood historical records, especially those that are impact-based, are not comprehensive, leading to additional barriers for flash-flood research and applications. In this paper we develop a method for associating VGI flood reporting clusters against authoritative data. Using Hurricane Harvey as a case study, VGI reports are assimilated into a spatial analytic framework that derives spatial and temporal clustering parameters supported by associations between Waze's community-driven emergency operations center and authoritative reports. These parameters are then applied to find previously unreported likely flash flood-events. This study improves the understanding of the distribution of flash flooding during Hurricane Harvey and shows potential application to events in other areas where Waze data and reporting from official sources, such as the National Weather Service, are available.

Indexed as

Cyclonic StormsDisastersFloodsRisk AssessmentWeather

Identifiers

PMID35347160
PMCPMC8960798
OpenAlexW4220769582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.