Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347102›Full record

SynthesisMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022

The Correlation of Mouse Double Minute 4 (MDM4) Polymorphisms (rs4245739, rs1563828, rs11801299, rs10900598, and rs1380576) with Cancer Susceptibility: A Meta-Analysis.

Jian Chen, Xudong Li, Ruihao Liu, Yufen Xie, Zhigao Liu, Haiwei Xiong, Yingliang Li

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jian ChenDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China (mainland).
Xudong LiDepartment of Surgery,, Wannian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shangrao, Jiangxi, China (mainland).
Ruihao LiuDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China (mainland).
Yufen XieDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China (mainland).
Zhigao LiuDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China (mainland).
Haiwei XiongDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China (mainland).
Yingliang LiDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China (mainland).
First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CNNanchang University · CNJiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Mouse double minute 4 (MDM4) has been extensively investigated as a negative regulator of P53, its negative feedback loop, and the effect of its genetic polymorphisms on cancers. However, many studies showed varying and even conflicting results. Therefore, we employed meta-analysis to further assess the intensity of the connection between MDM4 polymorphisms and malignancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS We searched eligible articles in 5 databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Wan Fang Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) up to August 2021. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized to probe the correlation of 5 MDM4 polymorphisms (rs4245739, rs1563828, rs11801299, rs10900598, and rs1380576) with carcinomas. We employed meta-regression and subgroup analysis to probe for sources of heterogeneity; Funnel plots, Begg's test, and Egger's test were used to evaluate publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was applied to assess the stability of the study. RESULTS Twenty-two studies, comprising 77 reports with 29 853 cases and 72 045 controls, were included in our meta-analysis. We found that rs4245739 polymorphism was a factor in reducing overall cancer susceptibility (dominant model, OR=0.85, 95% CI=0.76-0.95; heterozygous model, OR=0.86, 95% CI=0.78-0.96; additive model, OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.79-0.95), especially in Asian populations, and it also reduces the risk for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The remaining 4 SNPs were not associated with cancers. CONCLUSIONS The rs4245739 polymorphism might reduce the risk of malignancies, especially in Asian populations, and it is a risk-reducing factor for ESCC incidence. However, rs1563828, rs11801299, rs10900598, and rs1380576 are not relevant to cancer susceptibility.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMiceNuclear ProteinsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProto-Oncogene ProteinsRisk FactorsCell Cycle ProteinsMDM4 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins

Identifiers

PMID35347102
PMCPMC8976448
OpenAlexW4210908995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.