Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346981›Full record

SynthesisLupus science & medicine2022

Association between systemic lupus erythematosus and disruption of gut microbiota: a meta-analysis.

Shate Xiang, Yiqian Qu, Suhai Qian, Rongyun Wang, Yao Wang, Yibo Jin, Jie Li, Xinghong Ding

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lupus science & medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Updates on the Evaluation of Lupus Arthritis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shate Xiang *School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2223-7557
Yiqian Qu *School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Suhai Qian *School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Rongyun WangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Yao WangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Yibo JinSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Jie LiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Xinghong DingSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China dxh@zcmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecent studies reported that SLE is characterised by altered interactions between the microbiome and immune system. We performed a meta-analysis of publications on this topic.

methodsCase-control studies that compared patients with SLE and healthy controls (HCs) and determined the diversity of the gut microbiota and the abundance of different microbes were examined. Stata/MP V.16 was used for the meta-analysis. A Bonferroni correction for multiple tests was used to reduce the likelihood of false-positive results.

resultsWe included 11 case-control studies that examined 373 patients with SLE and 1288 HCs. These studies were performed in five countries and nine cities. Compared with HCs, patients with SLE had gut microbiota with lower Shannon-Wiener diversity index (weighted mean difference=-0.22, 95% CI -0.32 to -0.13, p<0.001) and lower Chao1 richness (standardised mean difference (SMD)=-0.62, 95% CI -1.04 to -0.21, p=0.003). Patients with SLE had lower abundance of Ruminococcaceae (SMD = -0.49, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.15,p=0.005), but greater abundance of Enterobacteriaceae (SMD=0.45, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.89, p=0.045) and Enterococcaceae (SMD=0.53, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.01, p=0.03). However, only the results for Ruminococcaceae passed the Bonferroni correction (p=0.0071). The two groups had no significant differences in Lachnospiraceae and Bacteroides (both p>0.05). Patients with SLE who used high doses of glucocorticoids had altered gut microbiota based on the Chao1 species diversity estimator, and hydroxychloroquine use appeared to reduce the abundance of Enterobacteriaceae.

conclusionsPatients with SLE have imbalanced gut microbiota, with a decrease in beneficial bacteria and an increase in harmful bacteria. Drugs used to treat SLE may also alter the gut microbiota of these patients.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeLupus Erythematosus, SystemicCase-Control StudiesHumansautoimmune diseasesautoimmunityoutcome assessment, health caresystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID35346981
PMCPMC8961174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.